Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Backpage Lawsuit

Backpage Lawsuit

Ratings: (0)|Views: 2,100 |Likes:
Published by Matt Driscoll

More info:

Published by: Matt Driscoll on Jun 05, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

06/05/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627COMPLAINT TO DECLARE INVALID AND ENJOINENFORCEMENT OF WASHINGTON SB 6251 — 1
Davis Wright Tremaine
LLP
L
AW
 
O
FFICES
 Suite 22001201 Third AvenueSeattle, WA 98101-3045206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTWESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTONAT SEATTLEBACKPAGE.COM, LLC,Plaintiff,v.ROB MCKENNA, Attorney General of theState of Washington; RANDY J. FLYCKT,Adams County Prosecuting Attorney;BENJAMIN C. NICHOLS, Asotin CountyProsecuting Attorney; ANDREW K. MILLER,Benton County Prosecuting Attorney; GARYA. RIESEN, Chelan County ProsecutingAttorney; DEBORAH S. KELLY, ClallamCounty Prosecuting Attorney; ANTHONY F.GOLIK, Clark County Prosecuting Attorney;REA L. CULWELL, Columbia CountyProsecuting Attorney; SUSAN I. BAUR,Cowlitz County Prosecuting Attorney;STEVEN M. CLEM, Douglas CountyProsecuting Attorney; MICHAEL SANDONA,Ferry County Prosecuting Attorney; SHAWN P.SANT, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney;MATTHEW L. NEWBERG, Garfield CountyProsecuting Attorney; ANGUS LEE, GrantCounty Prosecuting Attorney; H. STEWARDMENEFEE, Grays Harbor County ProsecutingAttorney;
(Continued on Page 2)
))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))No.
COMPLAINT TO DECLAREINVALID AND ENJOINENFORCEMENT OFWASHINGTON SENATEBILL 6251 FOR VIOLATIONOF THE COMMUNICA-TIONS DECENCY ACT, ANDTHE FIRST AND FIFTHAMENDMENTS ANDCOMMERCE CLAUSE OFTHE UNITED STATESCONSTITUTION
Case 2:12-cv-00954 Document 1 Filed 06/04/12 Page 1 of 11
 
 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627COMPLAINT TO DECLARE INVALID AND ENJOINENFORCEMENT OF WASHINGTON SB 6251 — 2
Davis Wright Tremaine
LLP
L
AW
 
O
FFICES
 Suite 22001201 Third AvenueSeattle, WA 98101-3045206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
 
(Continued from Page 1)
GREGORY M. BANKS, Island CountyProsecuting Attorney; SCOTT W.ROSEKRANS, Jefferson County ProsecutingAttorney; DAN SATTERBERG, King CountyProsecuting Attorney; RUSSELL D. HAUGE,Kitsap County Prosecuting Attorney;GREGORY L. ZEMPEL, Kittitas CountyProsecuting Attorney; LORI L. HOCTOR,Klickitat County Prosecuting Attorney;JONATHAN L. MEYER, Lewis CountyProsecuting Attorney; JEFFREY S.BARKDULL, Lincoln County ProsecutingAttorney; MICHAEL K. DORCY, MasonCounty Prosecuting Attorney; KARL F.SLOAN, Okanogan County ProsecutingAttorney; DAVID J. BURKE, Pacific CountyProsecuting Attorney; THOMAS A.METZGER, Pend Oreille County ProsecutingAttorney; MARK LINDQUIST, PierceCounty Prosecuting Attorney; RANDALL K.GAYLORD, San Juan County ProsecutingAttorney; RICHARD WEYRICH, SkagitCounty Prosecuting Attorney; ADAM N.KICK, Skamania County ProsecutingAttorney; MARK K. ROE, SnohomishCounty Prosecuting Attorney; STEVEN J.TUCKER, Spokane County ProsecutingAttorney; TIMOTHY D. RASMUSSEN,Stevens County Prosecuting Attorney; JONTUNHEIM, Thurston County ProsecutingAttorney; DANIEL H. BIGELOW,Wahkiakum County Prosecuting Attorney;JAMES L. NAGLE, Walla Walla CountyProsecuting Attorney; DAVID S.McEACHRAN, Whatcom CountyProsecuting Attorney; DENIS P. TRACY,Whitman County Prosecuting Attorney;JAMES P. HAGARTY, Yakima CountyProsecuting Attorney,Defendants, in theirofficial capacities.)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Case 2:12-cv-00954 Document 1 Filed 06/04/12 Page 2 of 11
 
 123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627COMPLAINT TO DECLARE INVALID AND ENJOINENFORCEMENT OF WASHINGTON SB 6251 — 3
Davis Wright Tremaine
LLP
L
AW
 
O
FFICES
 Suite 22001201 Third AvenueSeattle, WA 98101-3045206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax
 
For its complaint, plaintiff Backpage.com, LLC (“Backpage.com”) alleges asfollows:
INTRODUCTION
1.
 
This is an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Declaratory JudgmentAct, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, to enjoin enforcement of a new Washington law, Senate Bill 6251(“SB 6251”), that, if effective, would impose an intolerable burden on speech, in violationof the Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 230, and the First and FifthAmendments and Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.2.
 
SB 6251, scheduled to take effect June 7, 2012, will force, by threat of felonyprosecution, websites and others to become the government’s censors of users’ content.Although its ostensible motivation—to prevent the sex trafficking of children—is laudable,the law is not. It threatens five years imprisonment and a $10,000 fine per violation againstanyone who knowingly publishes, disseminates or displays
 or
 
anyone who “indirectly”“causes”
 
the publication, dissemination, or display of content that contains an explicit oreven “implicit” offer of any sexual contact for “something of value” in Washington if thecontent includes an image that turns out to be of a minor. Because of its expansivelanguage (
i.e
., “indirectly” “causes”), the law applies not only to online classified adservices like Backpage.com, but also to any website that allows third parties to post content,including user comments, reviews, chats, and discussion forums, and to social networkingsites, search engines, internet service providers, and more.3.
 
The law expressly states that it is
 not
a defense that the defendant did notknow that the image was of a minor. Instead, to avoid prosecution, the defendant mustobtain governmental or educational identification for the person depicted in the post(notably, even if that ID does
 not
contain a photograph). This means that every serviceprovider – no matter where headquartered or operated – must review
each and every
pieceof third-party content posted on or through its service to determine whether it is an“implicit” ad for a commercial sex act in Washington, and whether it includes a depiction
Case 2:12-cv-00954 Document 1 Filed 06/04/12 Page 3 of 11

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->