WHAT PRICE THE CHURCH’S SILENCE, AND THE NAACP’S BETRAYAL OF FACT, EVIDENCE, REASON AND DETAIL ON GAY MARRIAGE?PREAMBLE (37 additional reasons/answers are listed from page 3)Some clear answers for Black voters are forthcoming from the experience in the Tar Heel State! Three important questions were asked by thepeople of North Carolina as evidence, logic, reason and detail were given their proper place in social policy in early May 2012:
When the evidence is ignored by our politicians and legislators, are we in the realm of a political/legislative tyranny that deliberatelycircumvents a credible conclusion the people would have come to had they been allowed to consider the facts?
How reasonable is it to believe that “civil rights” ,,, and “gay rights” ... should not be based on evidence, reason, and detail?
When the evidence is ignored by our politicians, legislators and the judiciary, are we at the end of the law, the end of reason?Homosexuality and Transgenderism as medical conditions are the only two psycho-sexual/mental disorders so identified that set up as their ultimate and non-negotiable goal the destruction of core creation-structures in the Judeo-Christian and American ethos ... law, order, fact, truth,evidence, manhood, womanhood, sex, family, marriage ...
How significant is this?The people of North Carolina focused on seven fundamental analytical perspectives which some politicians in the USA are prepared to lie totheir teeth about... or completely ignore. After the very liberal Justice Kirby, the people recognized that good law should be based on good data,and the very least that our politicians and legislators can do is to familiarize themselves with the details!
They understood, with Justice Antonin Scalia in his written/read dissent in
Lawrence v. Texas
, that “gay rights” ... and thereby “gaymarriage” ... threaten entire swathes of the law of the land, portending anarchy in the name of defending a mental/psychosexualdisorder... and pro-gay politicians completely ignore the threat to the national ethos, citing Quinnipiac “polls” and an “evolution of thought” instead: “...
This effectively decrees the end of all morals legislation. If, as the Court asserts, the promotion of majoritarian sexual morality is not even a legitimate state interest,none of the above-mentioned laws can survive rational-basis review
No one ever addresses the astonishingly bad and “activist-court” inspired law ... dissected step by step in his dissent ... that AntoninScalia reveals
Lawrence V. Texas
They understood, with Kathleen Melonakos (“Why Isn’t Homosexuality Considered a Disorder on the Basis of Its Mdeical Consequences?”), the Surgeon-General (FDA Document 90-4239) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) “FastFacts on HIV/AIDS
2010”, that some politicians and legislators in 2012 are so bent on an activist pro-gay electioneering agenda that they were prepared tolie by omission ... or else ignore the country’s medical establishment ... about the astonishing fact that the gay “lifestyle” needs entiremedical brigades to support it, or else an entire national health policy built on the premise of “behaviour accommodation” rather thanthe strong demands for “behaviour modification” suggested by the common-sense of epidemiological protocol:The Surgeon-General:
"... Condoms provide some protection, but anal intercourse is simply too dangerous a practice..." ("Condoms and sexually transmitted diseases, especially AIDS": Article 7, FDADocument 90-4239).
Kathleen Melonakos asks: Why are recklessly indulgent politicians and legislators wilfully ignoring these facts?
“... As far as I know, there is no other group of people in the United States that dies of infectious diseases in their mid-forties except practicing homosexuals. This, to me, is tragic, when we know that homosexuality can be prevented, in many cases, or substantially healed in adulthood when there is sufficient motivation and help...” “... Dr. Satinover brilliantly laid out in his book, Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth the solid, irrefutableevidence that there are lethal consequences of engaging in the defining features of male homosexuality—that is,