Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
23Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
2012-06-04 - TAITZ v ASTRUE - Petition for Rehearing en Banc - TransportRoom

2012-06-04 - TAITZ v ASTRUE - Petition for Rehearing en Banc - TransportRoom

Ratings: (0)|Views: 599 |Likes:
Published by Jack Ryan
06/04/2012 PETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly Taitz for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 16-20. [11-5304]
06/04/2012 PETITION filed [1377943] by Appellant Orly Taitz for rehearing en banc. [Service Date: 05/31/2012 by US Mail] Pages: 16-20. [11-5304]

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Jack Ryan on Jun 11, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/26/2012

pdf

text

original

 
r-
 
.
.
I)
iVJai'l
Room
l
.J
UN -
4
2012
DR.
ORLY
TAITZ
ESQ
U
ni.t
cd.St
at<;
\Court
qr
i\prc?.ls
Dt
s
lrtc:t
olColulllh
ta Cm::utt
29839
SANTA
MARGARITA,
STE100RANCHO SANTA
MARGARITA,
CA
92688
PH
949-683-5411
FAX
040-766-7603
CALIC
223433
PROSE
IN
THE
DISTRICT
OF
COLUMBIA
IN
THE
COURT
OF APPEALS
DISTRICT
OF
COLUMBIA
ORLY
TAITZ
APPELLANT
v
MICHAEL
ASTRUE,
COMMISSIONER
OF
SOCIALSECURITY
ADMINISTRATION
APPELLEE
Case
#
11-5304
Taitzv Astrue Petition
for
Rehearing
En
Bane
1
USCA Case #11-5304 Document #1377943 Filed: 06/04/2012 Page 1 of 17
 
PETITION
FOR
REHEARING
EN
BANC
Comes
now
Appellant Dr. Orly Taitz,
ESQ,
(Hereinafter Taitz") and petitions
this
court for a rehearing en bane, due
to
flagrant error of fact and
law
and abuse
of
judicial discretion by
the
panel.History
of the
case
1.
This
case
is
an
appeal
of
a denial
for
information requested under
FOIA
5USC
§552
2.
Taitz submitted
to
the Social Security Administration (Hereinafter
"SSA"}
request
for
information under
the
Freedom
of
Information Act.
3.
This request contained information
that
Barack Hussein Obama, President ofthe United States, (Hereinafter "Obama"}
is
using a stolen Social Security numberxxx-xx-4425, which was issued in the state
of
Connecticut
to
another individual,resident
of
Connecticut,
who
was born in
1890.
4.
Taitz provided the
SSA
affidavits
from
a licensed investigator
Susan
Daniels
and
retired senior deportation officer John Sampson, (Exhibit
2}
which attested
to
thefact
that
the
SSN
in question started
with
digits 042, which were assigned
to
thestate
of
Connecticut. Obama was never a resident
of
Connecticut and there
is
no
Taitz v Astrue Petition
for
Rehearing
En
Bane
2
USCA Case #11-5304 Document #1377943 Filed: 06/04/2012 Page 2 of 17
 
possible reason
for
him
to
have a Connecticut
CCN.
Additionally, Taitz provided
SSA
with information
that
in
national databases
such
number
is
associated with
two
dates
of
birth: 1890 and 1961, which
is
an
additional indication
that
Obamaisillegally using a
SSN,
which was issued
to
a resident of
CT,
who was born in 1890,whose death was
not
reported
to
the
SSA,
and whose
SSN
was illegally assumedby Obama around 1980-1981. Taitz requested a redacted
55-5
application
to
theaforementioned
SSN.
Taitz advised
SSA
that
they are endangering the nationalsecurity
by
withholding the information in question.
SSA
refused
to
provide theredacted application.
5.
Taitz appealed. The
case
was assigned
to
judge
Royce
C.
Lamberth in the
US
District Court in the District
of
Columbia.
6.
Taitz provided judge Lamberth
with
all
of
the above information
as
well
as
asworn affidavit from Deportation officer Sampson, which stated
that
in
case
of
suspected
theft of
a Social Security number
it
is
common
for
the law enforcement
to
request and receive
from
the
SSA
the original application
to
the number
in
question, which would show some
of
the information in relation
to
the identity
ofthe
lawful holder
of
the
SSN
in question.
Such
information would include gender,date
of
birth, zip code, race. For example,
if
it
shows
that
the lawful holder
was
a
Taitz v Astrue Petition
for
Rehearing
En
Bane
3
USCA Case #11-5304 Document #1377943 Filed: 06/04/2012 Page 3 of 17

Activity (23)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
tesibria added this note
Silverbull8 said: "Accept that as truth. Look at all POTUS, except Arthur and Obama, native born to 2 US Citizens." SB8 is apparently forgetting the multiple VPs (who are also subject to SB8 's "truth."). UnderSB8's logic: Look at all POTUS, except for Obama - white, so POTUS must be white. Look at all POTUS except for Kennedy - noncatholic. Therefore, POTUS cannot be catholic.
silverbull8 added this note
You might not appreciate it, but Orly Taitz is fighting for you too.
Adam Kennedy added this note
Orly is the very best argument against any further issuance of a law degree via online schooling. I find it impossible to believe that she is unaware that she has proven NOTHING to this date. Also, Sampson did not verify anything for her. The burden of proof is on her yet she fails to admit this with each filing nor has she provided anything but baseless accusations.
Thomas Lee Brown added this note
What a imbessle. What a ultra-maroon.
la428 liked this
silverbull8 liked this
Jack Ryan liked this
funnyhaha71 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->