Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
2010 Interim Report on Conditions Inside Los Angeles County Jail

2010 Interim Report on Conditions Inside Los Angeles County Jail

Ratings: (0)|Views: 307|Likes:

More info:

Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/28/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 
2010 Interim Report on Conditions InsideLos Angeles County Jail
ACLU National Prison ProjectACLU of Southern California
September 9, 2010
 
Principal AuthorsMary TiedemanACLU Foundation of Southern California, Jails Project CoordinatorDaniel Ballon Jails Project Fellow, ACLU Foundation of Southern CaliforniaMelinda BirdDisability Rights CaliforniaPeter EliasbergManaging Attorney, ACLU Foundation of Southern California
 
 
2010 INTERIM REPORT ON CONDITIONS INSIDELOS ANGELES COUNTY JAILINTRODUCTION
The following is a summary of the ACLU’s findings concerning violence, retaliation, andovercrowding in Men’s Central Jail (“MCJ”) during the first eight months of 2010.
1
Thesefindings are based on hundreds of complaints received by our Jails Project intake system,observations recorded during our monitoring visits, and prisoner declarations attached to thisreport. Overall, we found that the most serious problems we reported in our “Annual Report OnConditions Inside Los Angeles County Jail” (“2009 Annual Report”)
2
continue: a pattern of excessive force by deputies; retaliation by Sheriff’s Department (“Department”) employeesagainst prisoners for communicating to the ACLU and other prisoners’ advocates about theconditions of their confinement; lack of access to adequate mental health care; and severeovercrowding, particularly in the MCJ dorms.This interim report also highlights findings from three investigative reports on the jailreleased in June and July 2010,
3
and from a state report on the jails that discusses overcrowdingin MCJ, which the ACLU obtained in 2010.
4
Especially striking is the introduction to the new
1
The inclusion of new findings on Deputy-on-Inmate Abuse, Continued Overcrowding in the Dorms at MCJ, andRetaliation against Inmates by LASD personnel in this report is not intended to suggest that other issues that weaddressed in our 2009 Annual Report on Conditions at MCJ have been resolved.
2
Filed with the Court on May 5, 2010
and
available from http://www.aclu-sc.org/documents/view/259
.
 
3
One report was released by Merrick Bobb, who serves as special counsel to Sheriff Baca and has issued a series of semi-annual reviews of the Sheriff’s Department for the past decade. 29
th
Semi-Annual Report by Special CounselMerrick J. Bobb and staff of the Police Assessment Resource Center (PARC), July 2010, available fromhttp://www.parc.info/client_files/LASD/29th%20Semiannual%20Report.pdf . Another report was issued by MichaelGennaco, Chief Attorney for the Office of Investigative Review (“OIR”), a county agency that reviews the Sheriff’sDepartment’s internal review of use of force and death incidents. OIR, Eighth Annual Report, June 2010, availablefromhttp://www.laoir.com/reports/oireightannualreportfinal.pdf . OIR also issued a follow-up report on the jail,entitled “Deputy Vigilance in the Jails,” July 19, 2010, available fromhttp://www.laoir.com/reports/Deputy%20Vigilance%20in%20Jails.PDF.
4
Letter from Magi Work, Field Representative, Facilities Standards and Operations Division, California Departmentof Corrections and Rehabilitation, Corrections Standards Authority (“CSA”), to Sheriff Leroy D. Baca (September 25, 2009) (“CSA Report”). This report was obtained from CSA in 2010 through a request under the CaliforniaPublic Records Act.
 
 3
report from Merrick Bobb, Special Counsel to Sheriff Baca and director of the PoliceAssessment Resource Center, which states that “[t]he incidents we describe in this report followlong-standing serious lapses by the Men's Central Jail staff leading to death and serious injury toinmates. Some have concluded that the jail is beyond the possibility of redemption. We reiteraterecommendations in earlier reports
that the facility should be shuttered and replaced 
.”(Emphasisadded).
5
Like Bobb’s report, this interim report describes long-standing problems that point tothe need for comprehensive reform of the jail system and closure of Men’s Central Jail.
I. VIOLENCE, EXCESSIVE FORCE AND FAILURE TO PROTECT
The ACLU’s 2009 Annual Report describes the pervasive pattern of violence that weobserved in Men’s Central Jail (MCJ) in 2009.
6
During the first eight months of 2010, theviolence has continued unabated. One aspect of the violence we discussed in our 2009 report wasdeputies’ use of excessive and unjustified force, which continues to date: in the five-month period from March 10 through August 10, 2010, we received more than 70 complaints of excessive and/or unjustified force, or retaliation by deputies against prisoners, or both. Twenty-of the prisoners making these complaints have provided us sworn written statements detailingtheir allegations.
7
 In 2010, prisoners continue to report that they are the target of unprovoked attacks bydeputies, with multiple deputies often joining in the beatings.
8
The injuries sustained by
5
Merrick Bobb and PARC, 29
th
Semi-Annual Report , page 3.
6
2009 Annual Report, pages 9-23.
7
We have not yet been able to interview all the prisoners who have complained to us about deputy abuse or retaliation. Other prisoners who complained have been unwilling to submit declarations because they fear retaliation by the deputies.
8
 
See, e.g.
, declaration of Prisoner 3, dated July 14, 2010, ¶ 5-7 (beaten for no reason, suffered brain injury);Prisoner 11, dated July 26, 2010, ¶ 4-11 (beaten for requesting a lower bunk, hospitalized for injuries to head, knee);Prisoner 13, dated July 7, 2010, ¶ 6-8 (beaten because he overslept, suffered fractured wrist); Prisoner 1, dated June15, 2010, ¶¶ 5-6 (beaten in head by seven deputies for asking if he could have a new pair of shoes); Prisoner 4, datedJuly 10, 2010, ¶¶ 4-5 (beaten until unconscious while in handcuffs); Prisoner 2, dated July 26, 2010, ¶ 4 (beatenuntil unconscious by multiple deputies for no reason, required surgery and suffered blunt head trauma); Prisoner 9,dated June 27, 2010, ¶¶ 6-7 (numerous deputies beat prisoner after he told deputies who were taunting and threw asandwich at another prisoner with signs of mental illness to stop picking on that prisoner); Prisoner 15, dated June

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->