Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Multiples
Enterprise Equity Operational
Asset based break up scenarios Optimal Deprival Value market power Capitalisation Rate real estate assets
Presentation Logic
Deals with:
Cost of capital Capital structure Cashflow model
Multiple model
Capital Structure I
Generally the capital structure consists of:
1.Equity
risk 2.Debt
Capital Structure II
Debt is lower cost than equity, but Using more debt adds financial risk, and Thus increases the cost of equity Debt may have tax
Cost of Capital I
Value is destroyed unless projects and companies meet or beat their cost of capital:
Cost of capital is an opportunity cost the sacrifice to investing in the company 2. Cost of capital represents the risks in investing in the company
1.
Cost of Capital II
Value is destroyed unless projects and companies meet or beat their cost of capital:
All providers face their own cost of capital debt, equity, or a mixture 2. The company faces a mix or blend called weighted average cost of capital.
1.
EVA, Cap rate, ODV, asset value 2.Including multiples, can be directly linked to cost of capital through the reciprocal relationship 3.Express cost of capital components in one way or another
Riskfree rate of interest such as the interest paid on government bonds PLUS
A premium for taking risk....
risk premium) of 4.0% 7.0% Times Equity Beta (the index of company risk)
The Riskfree rate PLUS a premium for equity market risk adjusted by BETA... The company risk index
market
beta
Example
The equity beta for the tele communications industry often sits at around 0.80. The Debt to total capital ratio for the tele communication industry often sits at around 50%
Estimating Beta
Building an equity beta:
Establish the equity beta for an industry Find asset beta given industry capital
Example
Industry equity beta is 0.80 Industry Debt to capital is 50% My company Debt to total capital is 65%
Summarising....
Cost of debt = risk free + debt risk premium Cost of equity = risk free + (equity beta *
ERP)
In the capital structure of debt and equity:
Equity is valued at the cost of equity Debt is valued at the cost of debt
So: Corporate tax rate = 30% Cost of debt = 8.5% Tax adjusted cost of debt = 0.08 * (1 0.3) = 5.6%
55 . % 5. % 55
of capital.
Why test?
Growth Cost of c apital Near term $ Terminal $ PV near term PV terminal Value 11 1 11 1 , 1 $ 5 % 5% 5 11 1 $ 11 1 Growth Cost of c apital Near term $ Terminal $ PV near term PV terminal Value 55 5 55 5 , 5 $ 5 % 5% 5 55 5 $ 55 5
$ $ $
55 5 55 5 , 5 55 5 , 5
$ $ $
55 5 55 5 , 5 55 5 , 5
All adjusted to normalise data and allow as analysis of like with like to greatest extent possible or feasible.
The idea is that, on average, a company should, over time have roughly the same value as its peers.
Example: If the ratio of Telco share prices to Telco earnings is 8.0 then a typical Telco earning $0.50 should trade at about: $0.50 x 8 = $4:00
extraordinary or one off effects Compute ratio numerous formulae available Apply multiple to company being valued
Enterprise Multiples
Estimate value of the enterprise to all capital providers: EBITDA most cash like, skirts accounting issues, captures operating costs, only deals with tax indirectly.
Revenue useful with negative or zero earnings, skirts accounting treatment, difficult to launder.
Equity Multiples
Estimate value of the enterprise to equity capital providers:
P|EBIT avoids tax and capital structure
A helpful relationship:
1 / P|EBIT = (pre tax) ROIC
Operating Multiples
Many industries have unique operating multiples which can be used comparatively:
Media P | number of subscribers Energy P | KWh production capacity Accommodation P | number of room Tourism P | visitor nights / spend Agriculture P | output per stock unit Telecom P | fixed / mobile subscribers
Multiples - Characteristics
Advantages
Simple and resource light Easy to communicate Commonly used
Disadvantages
Single variable focus simplistic Assume straight line trend Subjective in normalising and comparing
Conclusions
Valuation is...
A blend of art and science but a disciplined and systematic blend. Thoroughly dependent on all of the explicit and implicit assumptions made. An estimation process whose outer limits ought to be tested for revision purposes. Likely to perform best when it reflects fit for purpose decisions in design.