Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LAW OFFICES
2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA
NO. CV2012-090514 Plaintiff, vs. SULLIVAN MOTOR COMPANY, INC., et_ a!., Defendant.
In response to Plaintiffs Complaint, Defendant, through counsel undersigned, (Honorable John Ditsworth) ANSWER
10
11
12
13
14 15 16
17
In response to
18 19 20
21
information to admit or deny the allegations stated therein and therefore those allegations are denied.
2.
3.
Defendant admits the allegations in ~ 2 of the Complaint. Defendant denies the allegations in ~ 3 of the Complaint. In response to
~~
22
23 24 25 26
4.
4-5, Defendant admits only that jurisdiction and venue are proper,
5.
6.
Paragraph 6 of the Complaint does not require a response. Defendant denies the allegations in~~ 7-28 of the Complaint.
"
1 2 3 4
5
7.
and decisions referenced speak for themselves; to the extent any allegations are implied therein, Defendant denies the same.
8.
in~~
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
9.
Defendant denies and every other allegation of the Complaint not specifically
admitted herein, and denies that Plaintiff is entitled to any of the relief sought in his prayer for relief. 10. As affirmative defenses to the claims set forth in the Complaint, the Defendant
alleges as follows:
a.
Failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; Comparative Fault; Waiver/Release; and, Estoppel.
b.
c. d.
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Defendant reserves the right to assert such further affirmative defenses as may be supported by matters discovered hereafter. WHEREFORE having fully answered Plaintiffs Complaint, Defendant prays that it be dismissed; that Plaintiff take nothing thereby; that Defendant be discharged with its lawful costs herein incurred; and for such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 15th day ofMay, 2012. BROENING OBERG WOODS & WILSON, P.C.
23 24 25 26 By s/ Sarah L. Barnes Sarah L. Barnes Post Office Box 20527 Phoenix, Arizona 85036 Counsel for Defendant 2
2
3
4 5
On this 15th day of May, 2012, the foregoing was electronically transmitted to the ClerK's Office using the CMIECF System for filing and copy mailed to:
6
7
sf Kathy Lake
S:\RMM\Sullivan re Harris\Pieadings\Answer.doc
29135.017
8
9 10 11 12 13
14
15 16 17 18
19
20 21
22
i
23 24 25
' 1
'
26 3