Log In | Sign Up | Help
Upload_transparent

Deconstructing Deconstruction: Deconstructing Derrida

 
 
 
 
 
Value This
Doc 		Scribd
Average
     
Pages: 2 43
Words: 264 13640
Characters: 1793 81678
Lines: 12 623
     
     
Letters per word: 6.79 5.99
Words per line: 22.0 21.89
Words per page: 132.0 317.21

Document Information

  • Add_to_favs_transparent
  • Flag

4,887 Reads | 1 Like | 12 Comments | 3 Favorites

Added By
Description

In this Tract Book Essay, Anthony J. Fejfar deconstructs Derrida.

Pdf_16x16 2 Pages

Date Added

12/28/2006
Category

Uncategorized.

Tags
Groups

Anthony J. Fejfar, DERRIDA, Language Studies Group_add

Awards

Flame Hot

Copyright

Attribution Non-commercial

More info »

 

Comments

Login or Signup to Leave a Comment

Seferin 2 months ago

noob

Dfeiinrnderrety 2 months ago

Deconstuction is in no way negative. It is a neutral theory in which one takes apart an institution only to reconstuct another from the original. Its neither positive or negative. It is a theory which allows for interpretation. Derrida simply makes this analyses, there is no certainty that he "believes in" deconstruction as this is an impossiblilty as he himself has said deconstruction is "the experience of the impossible".
Although your essay is a fine example of it.

sbagram 2 months ago

Your essay was incredibly stupid. I mean it when I say that every sentence was wrong.

feylercim 6 months ago

People should not rely on hearsay anymore, we all know how to read, why don't we perform it then? Please read an introductory book on Derrida instead of making funny comments on the basis of hearsay.

Nyromantisk 6 months ago

Ja, ja, ja, ja!! XD Pide a tu Universidad que te devuelva el dinero de tu "educación".

MaryZg about 1 year ago

Well, this here "essay" sounds more like gibberish to me.
You can't dismiss anything, let alone one of the 20th century's most renowed philosphies, in 3 lines.
You can't do this even to homophobia, wich is in any case much more easily dismissable belief. Have you ever read anything Derrida wrote? There is deap seated affirmation of life in his philosophy, a whole bunch of passions, and a call to just society in his post-structuralist "giberrish". That "gibberish" is however not easily understood by people that hold that they have already understood everything, and all they have to do after that is to relate their absolute wisdom to unsuspecting others. So this "essay" shows merely the ignorance of the long-standing tradition of Continental philosophy on questions of the limits of knowledge and ethics, to which Derrida wholeheartedly belongs, neverminding his own deconstruction of all traditions.
So, I conclude, you must have a tenure as a law professor at a very important institution. In which case you'd really need all the luck you can get. You'll need it in fighting to clear the territory of thought of this neverending "gibberish" of these undying "post-structuralists ". I'd recommend you to start with Socrates, for you obviously know what already Socrates didn't.

ajfejfar about 1 year ago

Dear Spetuagint, Your post-structuralist sounding gibberish is great, you must have tenure as a law professor at a very important institution. Good Luck, Tony

gradwork -at- septuagint dot org about 1 year ago

Did you like my nonsensical post-structuralist sounding gibberish? I even threw in some Groucho Marx at the end. :)

Long live Derrida...err, oops.

ajfejfar about 1 year ago

Dear Speptuagint, I have found that if you stew fresh cranberries, they taste like cranberries. That is my realist response. Thanks, Tony Fejfar

septuagint about 1 year ago

This essay obviously lends credence to the binary opposition of unknowing and being. Being which is ontologically categorized in the Platonic dialogues as underdistinguished and marked by a post-structuralist antithetical khora. Khora which is apparently not situated into any known mythical telos can only be distinguished and therefore established by any known subject in an epistemological field. And if you take cranberries and stew them like applesauce they taste much more like prunes than rhubarb. Now tell me what you know.

ajfejfar over 2 years ago

Kbernstam, thanks for the comment. Tony

kbernstam over 2 years ago

While an interesting take on Deconstructionism, I would only read this as a personal opinion, not a resource for anything academic.