iii
Contents
Preface vPart One: The Recusal Statutes 1I.Summary 1II.History of Section 455 2III.Disqualification: Section 455(b) 6A.Personal Bias, Pre judice, or Knowledge: Section 455(b)(1) 6
B.Previous Service Connected to “Matter in Controversy”:Section 455(b)(2) 8C.Previous Government Employment: Section 455(b)(3) 9D.Financial Interest: Section 455(b)(4) 10E.Party to, Attorney in, or Other Substantial Interest in Pro-ceeding: Section 455(b)(5) 12IV.Disqualification Based on Question of Partiality: Section455(a) 15A.Standard for Applying 15B.Applications of Section 455(a) 191. Recusal usually unnecessary 19a.Judge’s adverse rulings or expression of opinion 20b.Rumor, suspicion, or innuendo 25c.Familiarity with parties or events 26d.Personal attacks on the judge 27e.Threats or lawsuits against the judge 282. Recusal more likely 29a.Close personal or professional relationship to attorneysor others 29b.Public comments or outside activities 33c.Ex parte contacts 37d.Involvement pertaining to guilty plea 38e.Judge took personal offense 39f.Miscellaneous 40V. Section 455(e): Waiver of Recusal 41VI. Section 455(f): Divestiture Can Overcome Disqualification 42
VII. Assigning Recusal Motion to a Different Judge 44