Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
10Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Dotcom v AG

Dotcom v AG

Ratings: (0)|Views: 73,457 |Likes:
Published by Juha Saarinen
Justice Helen Winkelmann ruling that the searches and seizures of Kim Dotcom and Megaupload assets were illegal.
Justice Helen Winkelmann ruling that the searches and seizures of Kim Dotcom and Megaupload assets were illegal.

More info:

Published by: Juha Saarinen on Jun 28, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/16/2014

pdf

text

original

 
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFNEWZEALANDAUCKLANDREGISTRYCIV-2012-404-1928[2012}NZHC1494
UNDERtheJudicatureAmendmentAct1972INTHEMATTEROFanapplicationforjudicialreviewandapplicationfororderforinterimreliefpursuanttosection8BETWEENKIMDOTCOMFirstPlaintiffANDFINNBATATOSecondPlaintiffANDMATHIASORTMANNThirdPlaintiffANDBRAMVANDERKOLKFourthPlaintiffANDATTORNEY-GENERALFirstDefendantANDTHEDISTRICTCOURTATNORTHSHORESecondDefendantHearing:22and23May,6June2012Counsel:PDavisonQC(22
&
23Mayonly),WAkelandRWoodsforFirstPlaintiffGJFoleyforSecond,Third
&
FourthPlaintiffsMRuffin(22and23Mayonly),FSinclairforFirstDefendant
(joined
incapacityasrepresentativeofNewZealandPolice)JPikeandAToohey(6Juneonly)forFirstDefendant(joinedincapacityastheCentralAuthorityforthepurposesoftheMutualAssistanceinCriminalMattersAct1992)
JUDGMENTOFWINKELMANNJ
Judgment:28June2012
DOTCOM
&
ORSVATTORNEY·GENERALHCAKCI2012-404-1928[28
June
2012J
 
This
judgment
wasdelivered
by
meon
28
June2012at3.30pmpursuanttoRule
11.5
oftheHighCourtRules.Registrar/DeputyRegistrar
 
TABLEOFCONTENTSIntroduction[1]A.Werethewarrantsinvalid?(i)Factualbackground[9]Executionofwarrantsanditemsseized[20](ii)JudicialreviewofsearchwarrantsissuedundertheMACMA[27](iii)Istheoffenceadequatelydescribedinthewarrants[36](iv)Wasthereadequatedefinitionoftheauthoritytosearchandseize[51](v)Shouldconditionshavebeenimposed?[78]B.DidthePoliceseizeitemsoutsidethescopeofthesearchwarrant?[87]C.WastheprovisionbythePoliceofcopiesofdigitalfilestotheFBIunlawful?[90](i)Doess49regulatephysicalcustodyofanitemonly?[93](ii)DidtheplaintiffsconsenttoimagesofcomputerharddrivesbeingshippedtotheFBIoffshore?[98]Firstphase[104]Secondphase[118]Thirdphase[122]Wasthereconsent?[134](iii)WouldtheSolicitor-Generalhaveconsentedtotheshipment?[141]Summaryoffindings[144]Relief[145]

Activity (10)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->