Page last reviewed: April 19, 2012
Maine1-4..........Maryland174272.9150.5760.4150.779.....Massachusetts103744.6930.8280.5831.141.....Michigan83342.9660.7680.5291.079.....Minnesota0..........Mississippi62323.9260.9610.6091.442.....Missouri1-4..........Montana1-4..........Nebraska1-4..........Nevada1-4..........New Hampshire0..........New Jersey209684.9301.1300.9161.380.....New Mexico1-4..........New York54184229.8400.8010.6890.9250.0000.4320.6951.2372.338NorthCarolina71745.0740.3770.2200.604.....North Dakota1-4..........Ohio1-4..........Oklahoma1-4..........Oregon1-4..........Pennsylvania43126144.1700.8740.7281.0410.1000.2960.7251.1842.028Puerto Rico0..........Rhode Island1-4..........SouthCarolina1-4..........South Dakota0..........Tennessee2574107.6400.6870.5400.863.....Texas185349.2501.0760.8061.408.....Utah0.......... Vermont0.......... Virginia72348.2630.4770.3020.715..... Washington162455.8700.4300.2750.639..... West Virginia1-4.......... Wisconsin81620.0650.7970.4551.295..... Wyoming0..........
All U.S.5071,3651,964.0390.6950.6590.7330.0000.2370.6111.0981.752
Footnotes for Table 3d:
Data from all NICU locations, including Level II/III and Level III nurseries. For purposes of thisreport, both umbilical line and central line associated bloodstream infections are consideredCLABSIs.1.To improve estimating SIR distributions, facility-specific key percentiles were only calculated forstates in which
≥
20 facilities had a predicted number of CLABSIs
≥
1.0 during the reportingperiod. If a single facility’s predicted number of CLABSIs was <1.0, a facility-specific SIR wasneither calculated nor included in the determinations of the distribution of facility-specific SIRs.2.
Next Table
2