Chapter 6
Page 223
66..11
TTHHEECCOONNSSTTRRUUCCTTIIOONNOOFFAACCCCOOUUNNTTIINNGGTTHHEEOORRIIEESS:: MMEETTHHOODDOOLLOOGGIIEESS,,AAPPPPRROOAACCHHEESSAANNDDMMEETTHHOODDSS..
How does one develop a theory of Islamic accounting? From the lessons ofconstructing accounting theories in conventional accounting, one could pursuevarious approaches such as those categorised by Belkaoui (1992).Belkaoui (1992) categorises such attempts as the “traditional”, “regulatory” and“other” approaches. The “other” approaches include the events, behavioural, humaninformation system, and the predictive and positive approaches. However, thecategorisation by Belkaoui is not unambiguous because the various categories seemto overlap. However, three basic approaches to accounting theory construction canbe gauged from both Belakoui (1992) and AAA (1977); the empirical inductiveapproach, the deductive approach and the information theory approach (Whittington,1986).
66..11..11
TThheeEEmmppiirriiccaallIInndduuccttiivveeAApppprrooaacchh::
The empirical inductive approach is an attempt to develop a theory based ongeneralising from empirical phenomenon. It has been used to rationalise
ex-post
,current accounting practice. The development of principles and accounting standarddevelopment process of the Anglo-American professional accounting bodies such asthe AICPA, and the CCAB, is one such approach; where standards are set asguidelines to regulate accounting practice.For the past two decades, the empirical-inductive theory has slipped into the realm ofpositive accounting theory (or PAT). The proposers of this theory, Watts &Zimmerman (1986) attempted to argue that accounting theory should be positive i.e.attempt to explain what is and help to predict future events, instead of trying topreach what ought to be. This has led to capital market research becomingmainstream in accounting. Unfortunately, the regulatory approach has also followedsuit in adopting the decision-usefulness paradigm (for example FASB, 1978).
Add a Comment