Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
See Premium Plans
 
No._INTHESUPREMECOURTOFILLINOISAT&TINTERNETSERVICES;BELLSOUTH.NET;CELLCOPARTNERSHIPD/B/AVERIZONWIRELESS;CENTURYTELINTERNETHOLDINGSINC.;COXCOMMUNICATIONS,INC.;EMBARQCOMMUNICATIONS,INC.;QWESTCOMMUNICATIONSCOMPANYLLC;VERIZONONLINELLC;andWAYPORT,INC.,CircuitCourtNo.11L683Movants,v.THEHONORABLEROBERTP.LECHIEN,JudgeoftheCircuitCourtofSt.ClairCounty,IllinoisRespondent,LIGHTSPEEDMEDIACORPORATION,PrevailingPartyBelow.EXPLANATORYSUGGESTIONSINSUPPORTOFRULE383MOTIONFORSUPERVISORYORDERDIRECTINGCIRCUITCOURTTOVACATEITSORDERDENYINGMOVANTS'MOTIONTOQUASH,OR,ALTERNATIVELY,DIRECTINGCIRCUITCOURTTOENTERFINDINGOF"FRIENDLY"CONTEMPTFORPURPOSESOFIMMEDIATEAPPEAL
 
TABLEOFCONTENTSANDPOINTSANDAUTHORITIESINTRODUCTION2
InreBitTorrentAdultFilmCopyrightInfringementCases,
2012WL1570765(E.D.N.Y.)2,3,5
Pac.Century
Int'l,
Ltd.
v.
JohnDoes1-37,
2012WL1072312(N.D.
Ill.
Mar.30,2012)3,6
FirstTimeVideos,LLC,
v.
Doe,
2012WL170167(E.D.Cal.Jan.19,2012)6
BACKGROUND81.TheBigPicture8
RawFilms,Ltd.
v.
Does1-32,
2012WL6182025(E.D.Va.Oct.5,2011)9
McGIP,LLC
v.
Doe,
2011U.S.Dist.LEXIS108109(N.D.Cal.Sept.16,2011).10
10Group,Inc.
v.
Does1-43,
2011U.S.Dist.LEXIS14123(N.D.Cal.Feb.3,2011)10
HardDriveProds.,Inc.
v.
Does,
2011U.S.Dist.LEXIS132449(N.D.Cal.Nov.16,2011)10
CinetelFilms,Inc.
v.
Does1-1,052,
2012WL1142272(D.Md.Apr.4,2012)10
AFHoldingsLLCv.Does1-135,
2012WL1038671(N.D.Cal.Mar.27,2012).10
PatrickCollins,Inc.
v.
JohnDoes1-23,
2012WL1019034(E.D.Mich.Mar.26,2012)11
K-Beech,Inc.
v.
JohnDoes1-41,
2012WL773683(S.D.Tex.Mar.8,2012)11
SBOPictures,Inc.
v.
Does1-87,
2012WL177865(D.D.C.Jan.19,2012).11
1
 
RawFilms,Inc.
v.
Does1-32,
2011WL6840590(N.D.Ga.Dec.29,2011).11
BerlinMediaArt
v.
Does1-654,
2011WL36383080(N.D.Cal.Oct.18,2011).11
HardDriveProductions,Inc.
v.
Does1-30,
2011WL4915551(E.D.Va.Oct.17,2011).11
Digil'rotectUSACorp.
v.
Does1-240,
2011WL4444666(S.D.N.Y.Sept.26,2011).11
OntheCheap,LLC
v.
Does1-5011,
2011WL4018258(N.D.Cal.Sept.6,2011).11
AFHoldingsLLC
v.
Does1-97,
2912909(N.D.Cal.July20,2011)11
2.Plaintiff'sImproperTacticsinaSeparateSt.ClairCountyProceeding,CurrentlyonAppeal12THEPROCEEDINGSBELOW13
1.
Plaintiff'sPleadingsandthe
ExParte
EarlyDiscoveryOrder13
SupremeCourtRule201(d)14
2.OrdersandEventsPrecipitatedbyEntryofthe
ExParte
EarlyDiscoveryOrder153.TheMovingISP'sMotionfor"Friendly"ContemptandthePlaintiff'sHarassingMotionfortheCourt-OrderedDepositionofAT&T'sChairmanandChiefExecutiveOfficer18
Peopleexrei.Scott
v.
Silverstein,
87Ill.2d167(1981)20
CityofChicago
v.
BerrettaUS.A.Corp.,
213Ill.2d351(2004)21
ARGUMENT23
I.
ASupervisoryOrderIsNecessaryandAppropriateHere23
Peopleexrel.Birkett
v.
Bakalis,
196Ill.2d510(2001)23
11
Search
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
    • Notes
    Load more