grievances
arbitrable
andsustaining
the
grievancesimpermissiblyinterferes
with
the
powers
of
thehighest
educational
authority
in
the
State
of
New York,
the
Commissioner
of
Education
("Commissioner"),
andnegates
his determinationapproving
the
DOE's
plans
to
close
24
failing
schoolsandopen
new
ones
in
their
places.
The
arbitrator's
award
not
only
violatespublicpolicy, but
was
alsomade
in
excess
of
the
arbitrator's
authority
under
the collective
bargaining
agreements
("CBAs")
between
petitioners
and
the
Unions,
and
New
York
law
governing
arbitration
awards.Moreseriousl¡
enforcement
of
the
award
would
consign
over
30,000
students
at24
struggling
public
schools
to
anotheryear
oflost opportunity.
2.
AsDeputy Chancellor
forPortfolio
Planning,
I
oversee
the
office
responsible
for
managingthe
portfolio
of
schools
in
the
City
School
District
and ensuring
that
all
students
have
access
to
highquality
educational
options.
I
have
held
my
present
position
since
May
2010,
and
havebeenemployed
previously
by
the
DOE
as
a teacher
between1995 and 1998
and
as
a
princþal
between2004and20Og.
Thisaffidavit
is
based
on
my
personal
knowledge
of
the
DOE's
determination
to
close and
replace
the
24
schoolsand
the
factors
that
led up
to
that
determination,
myreview
of
documents
referred
to below,
andconversations
with my
staff
and
other
DOE
employees.
Background
onthe
DOE's
ProposedReplacement of
Strueslinq
Schools
3.
Pursuant
to
8
N.Y.C.R.R.
$
100.2, the Commissioner
designates
schools that
are
thefarthestfrommeeting
certainacademicbenchmarks he
has
estabiished
and
most
in
need
of
improvement
as
SchoolsUnderRegistration
Review
("S[IRR").
Many
SURR
schools
are
alsodesignated
as
persistently lowestachieving
("PLA")
schools,
based
on,
amongother things,
their
low
graduation
ratesand/or
failure
to
make
adequate
yearly
student
progress.
See
8
N.Y.C.R.R.
1
00.2(pxe).
1