Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
7Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
-Solutions to Real and Complex Analysis-By Walter Rudin

-Solutions to Real and Complex Analysis-By Walter Rudin

Ratings: (0)|Views: 642|Likes:
Published by Ritzo Wa

More info:

Published by: Ritzo Wa on Jul 04, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

04/30/2014

pdf

text

original

 
SOLUTIONSTOREAL AND COMPLEXANALYSIS
Collected By Davood.M.Manshadi 
dm.manshadi@gmail.com
20 July,2009
c
2009 This page created by the D.M.Manshadi in
L
A
TEX.
1
 
Solutions to
Real and Complex Analysis
Steven V Sam
ssam@math.mit.edu
July 14, 2009
Contents
L
1 Abstract Integration
1.
Exercise.
Does there exist an infinite
σ
-algebra which has only countably many members?
Solution.
The answer is no. Let
be a measurable set with an infinite
σ
-algebra
M
. Since
M
isinfinite, there exists nonempty
M
properly contained in
. Both
and
c
are measurablespaces by letting the measurable subsets of 
(resp.
c
) be the intersections of measurablesubsets of 
with
(resp.
c
). Since
M
is infinite, at least one of these two
σ
-algebras mustbe infinite.Now we define a rooted binary tree inductively as follows. The root is our set
. Given avertex which is a measurable subset
of 
, if it contains a proper measurable subset
, pickone such subset, and let its two successors be
and
\
. The remarks above guaranteethat this tree is infinite, and hence has infinite depth. So pick an infinite path consisting of subsets
0
1
2
...
. Then the sets
i
=
i
\
i
+1
form an infinite collection of disjointnonempty measurable subsets of 
by construction. At the very least,
M
needs to contain everyunion of such sets, and this is in bijection with the set of subsets of 
N
, which is uncountable.Thus,
M
must be uncountable.2.
Exercise.
Prove an analogue of Theorem 1.8 for
n
functions.
Solution.
We need to prove the following: if 
u
1
,...,u
n
are real measurable functions ona measurable space
, and Φ is a continuous map of 
R
n
into a topological space
, then
h
(
x
) = Φ(
u
1
(
x
)
,...,u
n
(
x
)) is a measurable function from
to
.Define
:
R
n
by
x
(
u
1
(
x
)
,...,u
n
(
x
)). By Theorem 1.7(b), to prove that
h
is measurable,it is enough to prove that
is measurable. If 
R
is any open rectangle in
R
n
which is the Cartesian
third edition, by Walter Rudin
1
 
1 ABSTRACT INTEGRATION 
2product of 
n
segments
1
,...,I 
n
, then
1
(
R
) =
u
11
(
1
)
∩···∩
u
1
n
(
n
), which is measurablesince
u
1
,...,u
n
is measurable. Finally, every open set of 
R
n
is the countable union of suchrectangles, so we are done.3.
Exercise.
Prove that if 
is a real function on a measurable space
such that
{
x
|
(
x
)
r
}
is measurable for every rational
r
, then
is measurable.
Solution.
Let
R
1
be an open set. First,
can be written as a union of countablymany open balls with rational radii that are centered at rational points. So to prove that
1
(
) is measurable, it is enough to prove this when
is an open ball of this form, saywith radius
r
and center
c
. Since the set of measurable sets is closed under complements andfinite intersections, every set of the form
{
x
|
r
1
>
(
x
)
r
2
}
is measurable for rational
r
1
,r
2
. Now note that
{
x
|
c
+
r >
(
x
)
> c
r
}
can be written as the countable union
n
1
{
x
|
c
+
r >
(
x
)
c
r
+ 1
/n
}
, so
1
(
) is measurable.4.
Exercise.
Let
{
a
n
}
and
{
b
n
}
be sequences in [
−∞
,
], and prove the following assertions:(a) limsup
n
→∞
(
a
n
) =
liminf 
n
→∞
a
n
.(b) limsup
n
→∞
(
a
n
+
b
n
)
limsup
n
→∞
a
n
+ limsup
n
→∞
b
n
provided none of the sums is of the form
.(c) If 
a
n
b
n
for all
n
, thenliminf 
n
→∞
a
n
limin
n
→∞
b
n
.
Show by an example that strict inequality can hold in (b).
Solution.
The supremum
A
k
of the set
{−
a
k
,
a
k
+1
,...
}
is the negative of the infimum
A
k
of the set
{
a
k
,a
k
+1
,...
}
. Hence inf 
k
{
A
k
}
=
sup
k
{
A
k
}
, which implies (a).The relationsup
{
a
k
+
b
k
,a
k
+1
+
b
k
+1
,...
} ≤
sup
{
a
k
,a
k
+1
,...
}
+ sup
{
b
k
,b
k
+1
,...
}
is clear, so this implies (b). To see that the inequality in (b) can be strict, consider
a
1
= 1,
a
i
= 0for
i >
1, and
b
1
=
1,
b
i
= 0 for
i >
1. Then limsup(
a
n
+
b
n
) = 0, but limsup
a
n
+limsup
b
n
= 1.Now suppose that
a
n
b
n
for all
n
. Then inf 
{
a
k
,a
k
+1
,...
} ≤
inf 
{
b
k
,b
k
+1
,...
}
for all
k
, so (c)follows.5.
Exercise.
(a) Suppose
:
[
−∞
,
] and
g
:
[
−∞
,
] are measurable. Prove that the sets
{
x
|
(
x
)
< g
(
x
)
}
,
{
x
|
(
x
) =
g
(
x
)
}
are measurable.(b) Prove the set of points at which a sequence of measurable real-valued functions converges(to a finite limit) is measurable.
Solution.
First note that
(
x
)
g
(
x
) is a measurable function. The first set of (a) is thepreimage of the open set [
−∞
,
0], so is measurable. Also, the set where
and
g
agree is thecomplement of where
(
x
)
g
(
x
)
= 0, which is measurable.

Activity (7)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
Hyun Joo Yoo liked this
Hyun Joo Yoo liked this
Ashoka Vanjare liked this
Ph Nguyễn liked this
goiuld777 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->