07/05/282211:35
%5541:,82
PAGE
02/09
such?As
E.\
consequence,
thisCourtfoundasapreliminarymatterthattheevidenceagainsttheDefendantwas"strong."SincetheJune29,2012hearingaddressedwhethertoreinstatethebondwasnotan
Arthur
hearing,
the
presentationofevidenceattackingtheState'scaseisof
limited
relevanceatthisstageofthe
proceedings.
Nonetheless,theCourt
reviewedallof
the
exhibits
andconsideredthewitnesses'testimony
regarding
theDefendant'sself-defense
theory.
The
actual
questionsbefore
the
Courtatthistimearc:is
the
Defendantentitledtobailwhenhepresentsfalsetestimonyatapriorbondhearingandwhatrecoursethereis
when
theDefendanthasshownblatantdisregardforthejudicialsystem,TheFloridaConstitutionofferssomeguidance.
Art.T,
§
14
states:Unlesschargedwithacapitaloffenseoranoffensepunishable:
by
lifeimprisonmentand
the
proofofguiltisevidentandthepresumptionisgreat,
every
personchargedwithacrimeoraviolationofmunicipalOrcountyordinanceshallbeentitledtopretrialreleaseonreasonableconditions.Ifnoconditionsofreleasecanreasonablyprotectthecommunityfromriskofphysicalharmtopersons,assurethepresenceoftheaccusedattrial,orassuretheintegrityofthejudicialprocess,theaccusedmaybedetained.
By
itsplainlanguage,thisCourtisauthorizedtodetaintheDefendantwithoutbailifitisdeterminedthatitisnecessarytoassuretheintegrityofthejudicialprocess.Underanydefinition,theDefendanthasflauntedthesystem.CounselhasattemptedtoportraytheDefendantasbeingaconfusedyoungmanwho
was
fearfuIandexperiencedamomentofweaknessand
who
mayalsohaveactedoutofasenseof"betrayal"
by
thesystem.Baseduponalloftheevidencepresented,thisCourtfindstheopposite.TheDefendanthastriedtomanipulatethesystemwhenhehasbeenpresentedtheopportunitytodoso.Heisanadult
by
everylegaldefinition;TrayvonMartinistheonlymale
whose
youthisrelevanttothiscase,TheDefendanthastakencoursesincriminaljustice
with
theintentionofbecomingapoliceofficer,anattorney,ajudge,or~magistratelikehisfather.Hehasbeenarrestedbefore,havingenteredandsuccessfullycompletedapre-trialinterventionprogram.Hehasalsoobtainedaninjunctionandhadaninjunctionenteredagainsthim.TheinjunctionagainsthimhasobviouslybeendissolvedatsomepointforhimtohavevalidlyobtainedapermittocarrythefirearmusedtoshootTrayvonMartin.Healsohadthewherewithal
to
setupawebsitetocollectdonationstohelpdefraythecostsofhisdefense.Thus,beforethistragicincident,theDefendanthadaverysophisticatedknowledgeofthecriminaljusticesystemoverandabovethatoftheaverage,law-abidingcitizen.
Moreover,
anysenseof
"betrayal"
wouldbe
unreasonable.
HewascooperativewiththeSanfordPolleeDepartmentinthathedidgivenumerousstatementsuponrequest.TheStatenotesthathisstorieschangedeachretelling,butonthesurfaceheshouldbedeemedtohavebeencooperative.However,heclearlyunderstoodthathewasbeinginvestigatedforcommittingahomicide
and,
whilehebelievesthathewasjustifiedin.hisactions,there
has
beennothingpresentedwhichindicatesthathewasmisledinto
I.
Argument
by
counselisnotevidence.
Seee.gWheelerv.Stare,
311.So.2d713(Fla.4thDCA1975)(notingthatcounsel'sopeningstatementIsnotevidence),
2