Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
9Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Weiss Family Statement

Weiss Family Statement

Views: 30,233 |Likes:
Published by yadmoshe

More info:

Published by: yadmoshe on Jul 06, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Visibility:Private
See more
See less

11/06/2013

pdf

text

original

 
 " , 
Over the past two years, Avrohom Meir Weiss and his wife Gital have been going through a difficult and tryingtime. Lamentably, the Dodelsons have chosen to bring this story into the street.It appears that over the past 6-7 months, the Dodelson family has been circulating a supposed “siruv” writtenagainst Avrohom Meir as part of their slanderous campaign.We are therefore compelled, in the spirit of , to publicize, with supporting documentation, the truth:that the so-called “siruv” was issued completely , and has no validity. We will limit our statements atthis time to the facts that surround this particular injustice. We hope that revealing the truth will stop thespreading of lies.The “siruv” was issued based on the notion that Avrohom Meir “took his wife to without a
heter 
.However, these are the facts:Avrohom Meir’s child was withheld from him in contravention of an explicit prior arrangement. Thisepisode was recorded, and there is even a letter from R’ Malkiel Kotler – a first cousin to theDodelsons – admitting that this occurred.After consulting with Morei Horaah
and being issued a written
, Avrohom Meir went tocourt to enforce his rights vis-à-vis his child, and sought joint legal custody. He had no choice but todo so; in the State of New Jersey this is the only way for a parent to protect his legal rights vis-à-vishis child. Reputable Batei Din fully recognize this as being true.The Dodelsons filed numerous counterclaims. Ultimately, they also filed a completely new suit for divorce. This new suit supplanted all previous filings, and rendered Gital Dodelson the plaintiff andthe only one who could possibly withdraw the complaint; Avrohom Meir was (and still is) only adefendant. Has anyone ever heard of a defendant being able to withdraw a complaint?
 
 
Long before Mechon L’Hoyroa issued their bogus “siruv,” Avrohom Meir made clear to them
inwriting, and with supporting documentation,
that (a) he went to court with a
heter,
(b) that he wasno longer a plaintiff, and thus could not possibly withdraw the case from court; and (c)
that he wasfully prepared to go to a
 Beis Din
of 
 zabla.
He also provided them with the name of the Rav withwhom he had already signed a
shtar borerus.
In fact, before Mechon L'hoyroa issued their “siruv,” they wrote Avrohom Meir a letter,attached herein,
in which they themselves acknowledged 
that he was prepared to go before a
 Beis Din
of 
 zabla
, and they requested only that he provide documentation that his wife was now thePlaintiff in the ongoing court matter.
They had already been provided with that documentation.
 
Avrohom Meir was therefore quite surprised by the baseless letter, purporting to be a “siruv,” that he later received.Regrettably, the Dodelsons have shown this document to numerous Rabbanim, in order to persuade them to signa letter against Avrohom Meir.
None of those who signed ever called either Avrohom Meir, anyone fromhis family, or his
 Boreir
to hear his side of the story.
Furthermore,
DESPITE THE OBFUSCATION, THEALLEGED “SIRUV” HAS NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH THE ISSUANCE OF A GET.
 
NO
 BEIS DI
HAS EVER RULED OR WRITTEN THAT AVROHOM MEIR IS A , DESPITEWHAT THE DODELSONS AND THEIR ALLIES AT YESHIVA UNIVERSITY AND ORA WOULDHAVE YOU BELIEVE.
Right now, the court case [that’s right the suit for divorce that is in , brought there by
Gital Dodelson
]is in middle of a complex, prohibitively expensive trial that is draining our family of all our financial resources.Indeed, it is our belief that this is exactly what the Dodelsons and their supporters are trying to do; there isnothing at all Avrohom Meir or his family can do to stop these proceedings.Sincerely,Mishpachas Weiss
 
 
A BRIEF TIMELINE OF KEY EVENTS IN THIS CASEMarch 12, 2010 Avrohom Meir’s son is withheld from him when he came, inaccordance with a previous arrangement, to pick him up for Shabbos.This episode (including Mr. Dodelson’s threat of physical violence,should Avrohom Meir attempt to take his son) was captured on arecorder, transcribed by a court transcriber, and entered into the courtrecord.March 15, 2010 A
heter arkaos 
is issued (Documents A1 & A2), and Avrohom Meirturns to the courts to protect his rights.September 16, 2010 Mechon L’Hoyroa issues a first
hazmanah 
(two days before
Yom Kippur 
)
 
to Avrohom Meir regarding taking his wife to
arka’os 
(Document B).September 22 /October 20 2010 Avrohom Meir replies to the
hazmanah 
(Documents C1 & C2).November 4, 2010 Mechon L’ Hoyroa issues a third hazmanah (Document D).November 7, 2010 Avrohom Meir writes to Mechon L’Hoyroa confirming that he isprepared to go before a
Beis Din 
of
zabla 
(Document E).December 28, 2010 The Doelsons’
to’ein,
Mr. Shmiel Fried, writes to Mechon L’Hoyroa thatAvrohom Meir has not chosen a
boreir 
(Document F).January 5, 2011 R’ Yehoshua Heshel Wolhendler confirms to Mechon L’Hoyroa that hehas been chosen by Avrohom Meir as his
boreir 
(Document G).January 6, 2011 Mechon L’Hoyroa writes Avrohom Meir a letter of
hasraas siruv 
(Document H).

Activity (9)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->