You are on page 1of 14

Gordon Hall Bellingham, September 2009 Audio 01

Man has millions of codes and statutes. How can you honor all of them? Gods Laws are basic and essential - real. Proverbs 11:15: He that is surety for a stranger, smart for it Proverb = an enigmatic saying in which a profound truth is cloaked. Our problem is that we have kept stepping into suretyship for JOHN DOE. Romans 12:2: Be not conformed to this world, but be ye transformed by a renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is right and acceptable in perfect will of God. No more fighting or agreeing in silence. Sailing the seas of commerce, we, as creditors, accept offers, at least conditionally. Creditor = Someone to whom money is owed. Good Source: Websters Dictionary 4th or 5th ed. In everyday speech, we have lots of words that mean pretty much the same thing. Context determines much of the definition. The language of Law, though, is very precise and slow to change. Nothing can be proven. If you are impeccable, you dont need evidence (such as a UCC-1) in court. Make them prove it. A policeman wanting to arrest you, a process server serving you a summons, etc. are offers. John, who had been fighting a lawsuit against him for many months, finally, got a certified copy of the indictment/ complaint and conditionally accepted it with an Affidavit in Support in negative averment form and sent it to the prosecutor (copy) and the judge (original). I conditionally accept your offer upon condition that any determination or decision in the matter shall be in accord the record and pleadings [administrative record on the private side] attached herewith, which is accepted, has not set off, settled and closed the matter. Motive is determined or evaluated objectively. Silence binds the offeree in two situations: If the offeror proffers property or services with the offer, and the offeree, having reasonable time & opportunity to refuse, exercises any ownership rights over the property or keeps the benefit of any service, the offer is accepted. If the CFO doesnt return to you your money order, he accepted it; a binding contract is formed.

Sovereign = authority Law = contract as = in the capacity of to = resulting in One mistake usually wont kill you, two probably will (second witness). U.S. v. Pruden: Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty or respond or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. Constitution doesnt grant rights; just guarantees.

Audio 02
Name = word by which a person or thing is known CAfV an indictment upon proof of a bona-fide claim CAfV a public defender, upon condition that 1) he accept private compensation payment; and 2) he accepts liability (surety) for the defendant and the court approve it in writing. bona-fide = genuine, real, without fraud or deceit They want your name so they can open an account to lodge pecuniary damages, but your name is your property. Im the agent for John Doe how can I help you? [confession & avoidance] Well, I accept your offer to come with you, conditional upon presentation of a bona-fide claim, subscribed on the undersigneds personal unlimited commercial liability in accord with HJR-192 and upon written proof of claim that you have authority over me. After an arrest, they need to book you (charge you with a legal offense). Booking = administrative steps taken after an arrested person is brought to the police station and involves entry of persons name, the crime for which the arrest was made and other relevant facts on the police blotter, which may also include photographing, fingerprinting and the like. They need you to argue, fight, go silent or answer questions. CAfV. Police are required to show theyre I.D. Whats your name? Who are you and why do you want to know? Are you John Doe? Why do you want to know? Are you John Doe? How can I help you?

Audio 03
Dont answer questions on the phone. under protest

all rights and defenses reserved without prejudice JOHN DOE By: John Doe, Authorized Representative Is it a problem to reserve my rights? Just wasnt built for bondage, Honey. asking = as-king = in the capacity of king 1933 Amendment to the Trading with the Enemy Act includes U.S. citizens. You cant serve both the Democracy and the Republic. Are you threatening me? By what authority? Contracts: express: manifest viva voce (voice) or in writing implied: by silence, signs or acts fighting is arguing, explaining, justifying, reasoning We need to get your fingerprints to release you: Why do I need to give you my private property to discharge me? Appearance: General: simple, unqualified, unrestricted submission to the jurisdiction of the court Special: submission to the jurisdiction for a specific purpose only Im here today in special appearance as John Doe, intervener, attorney in fact on the private side. or just: Im here today as John Doe, intervener. terminate attorneys forgiveness letter; how can we help now settle this matter? hearing set the next day taking the 5th = agreeing by acquiescence Govern yourself or it will be done for you. Ignorance and freedom cannot co-exist. A sovereign does not make excuses; a sovereign takes responsibility Body: Cultivate the physical only and you have an athlete or a savage; Mind: Cultivate the moral only and you have an enthusiast or a maniac; Heart:: Cultivate the intellect only and you have a diseased oddity which may be a nazi monster. Be whole. Rights and duties are correlative. You have rights to the extent that you do your duties.

Audio 04
Whats the Constitution say about contracts? Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1: No State shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts. Only your agreements bind you. If an offer (no matter what it is) is not desirable, counter-offer. charge = to impose a task or responsibility on. impose = to practice deceit on. de facto = existing in fact but not legally established. remittance = money sent by one person to another, either in specie, BoE, a check or otherwise. acceptance = an agreement either by express act or by implication from conduct to the terms of an offer so that a binding contract is formed. Aunt Marge conditional acceptance: Im in receipt of your letter, dated ___, attached herewith; current balance: $___. Please find enclosed copies of documents sent to your CFO, including but not limited to remittance, which is accepted and that has set off, settled and closed the account. See attached Exhibit A (four pages + remittance) and documents in response to telephone conversations, dates ___ - see attached Exhibit B (six pages). Therefore, you entered into a valid and enforceable contract with me, received the benefits of the contract and agreed to set off, settle and close the account in accordance with the terms noted in this agreement. The account is set off, settled and closed. Further attempts to collect on an account already agreed as set off, settled and closed leads me to believe you may be committing fraud and shall incur a penalty and/or liability of $100,000 (one hundred thousand U.S. dollars). If your attempts to collect, failing to credit said account via remittance or a mistake, inadvertence, etc., please adjust the account to reflect the parties agreement that the account is set off, settled and closed, to avoid incurring any penalty or liability in the matter regarding account numbered ____. leads me to believe you may be committing fraud is not accusing. Pay more attention, perhaps, to what they do, rather than what they say. Conditional acceptances are all counter-offers that have the legal effect of rejecting the offer. CAfV even an indictment, and send it back. Dont defend. apology = a formal defense in speech or writing sorry = inferior, substandard forgive me = give up all claim to punish or exact penalty Forgive me. I accept your offer, Judge, conditional upon proof of claim that the record and pleadings of the parties, which is accepted, has not already set off, settled and closed this matter. Are we not ready to adjourn this hearing and submit the matter under law to an issue of an order to discharge the U.S. claims or charges and discharge the defendant from any further public duty or obligation in this matter? The Kings men are beating down the castle door the lieutenant says to the servant who opens the door: Wheres your master? We found the body of a dead peasant girl on your property. Master of the House says So, Lieutenant, tell me, were your men poaching or trespassing when they found the body of the dead peasant girl?

pleadings = the process performed by the parties to a suit or action in alternately presenting written statements of their contention, each responsive to that which precedes and each serving to narrow the field of controversy until there evolves a single point, affirmed on one side and denied on the other, called the issue (upon which they then go to trial) Anyone who hires an attorney is deemed an incompetent ward of the State. Attorneys loyalty is to 1) the court; 2) the public; 3) client. Terminate your attorney. termination = ending of a contract without it being broken by either side.

Audio 05
Is there not a show cause order before the court to discharge the case and discharge the defendant from any further liability and/or duty in the matter? Are you John? You may refer to me as John. [You may submit it for my consideration. What ya got?] refer = submit for consideration Are you John Doe? Whats this regarding? [confession & avoidance] 1. Notice of Private International Remedy Demand 2. Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure 3. Notice of Default Ignorance of the law is no excuse. law = contract You cannot be aware of all of the laws, but you can and need be aware of all of your contracts.

Audio 06
18USC 242: alien; deprivation of rights under color of law; 5USC 52a For the record and on the record, I want the court to know that I come in peace. All things stated are stated without prejudice; all rights are reserved, restored and never waivered. I accept that for value, honor and consideration according to HJR192; Public Policy 73-10; Title 31, Section 5118. I accept for value the court proceedings for full settlement and closure of Case #___; exempt from levy & lien. Whenever a new attorney comes in: Can you please state your name and BAR# for the record? Let the record reflect that I accept for value for full assessment of the charges, Attorney Name, BAR #___ for full assessment of the charges. it looks like you committed fraud, so either give me my money back or it is agreed that you committed fraud and you owe me $___, triple amount.

refusal (of certified mail, say) = agreement, acceptance Your paperwork doesnt have to be exact or even correct if youre impeccable in the oral hearing. Romans 8:28: All things work together for them that love God. In common parlance, going to court is synonymous to going to trial. Youre welcome = youre under no obligation for the favor given

Audio 07 Audio 08
You cannot prove anything. make use of negative averments. Shift the onus probondi (burden of proving).

Audio 09 Audio 10

Q&A
Enter the BAR: Im here as John Doe, intervener, merely for the purpose of helping all parties settle all outstanding claims, is it OK to come in on that basis? Come in or silence: Let the record show that hearing no objection this court will allow me to enter into the Bar to assist this court to settle and close this matter to the benefit of all parties. Threat: Your honor may I not reserve all my rights, remedies, privileges and immunities and let the record show that I will obey the court based on a continuing notice of reservation of all rights, titles and immunities without prejudice. I will take your response as permission to enter under the terms and conditions I so stated. Attorney: Your Honor, can the respondent show where an attorney is necessary in this matter since is there not before this court a motion for Entry of Default Judgment based upon satisfaction to all prties in this matter?

Are you saying I cannot resolve this matter directly without having an attorney and receiving public benefits? 1. Your Honor, has this hearing not been scheduled for a discussion and an order for Entry of Default Judgment in this matter pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 55? 2. Your Honor, if the motion is brought before the court and has been scheduled for the hearing today are you suggesting that the procedure for bringing my motion for Entry of Default Judgment before the court is improper because it was not brought by an attorney or counsel and therefore I can get no remedy today in this court on this matter? 3. :Your Honor, are you saying to me that this court is not going to hear my motion that is properly before this court today? Are you telling me then I can follow your orders directly without waiving or surrendering any substantive right or issue, claim, title, etc. in this matter? Are you telling me the documents can only be submitted by an attorney? Over my objection the answer is yes or no! Let the record show my counter-offer has been accepted. Are you denying me the right to contract by denying me the right to plead by way of a counter-offer? Your Honor would this court entertain a 3 day leave to permit me to prepare a responsive pleading to settle and close this matter? Let the record show I am accepting for vaJue and honor and returning for value and honor the governments offer for Settlement and closure and at this time may I have leave of court to prepare the documents in support of this pleading? HOW DO YOU PLEAD? Would it not be inappropriate at this time to enter any plea since pleadings that are properly before the court make moot the government charges? Your Honor do not the pleadings that I have submitted to this court in response to the government charges make the government charges moot? Is this court telling me that procedurally my counter-claim is moot because the time for hearing has expired? Your Honor if it please the court I fully accept for value and honor and return for value and honor the new offer by the US and I request 3 days time to generate the proper paperwork and response to help this court settle and close this new offer? Is this necessitated by the fact that the timing for bringing this process for a public order has expired?

Are you representing me? And are you denying the right to contract by way of a counter-offer that will make the US whole in this matter? Let the record show I am not waiving my rights,titles interests, claims, etc. and protest your acts and actions. Will this court entertain a tender of a persona) bond in lieu of seizing the collateral to guarantee or underwrite these charges so the vessel may be released to perfonn in commerce? Is this court refusing to respond to my filed motion for Entry of Default Judgment? CRlMINAL NOT CIVIL Your Honor is not the proper pleading before this court today upon which the rules of procedure apply in the appeal ofan administrative process which does not the record of that process show that the US charges and claims with respect to supervised release, restitution and other collateral issues of the original judgment have been satisfied, set-off and closed? How can there be a charge of a criminal violation of probation and failure to pay restitution has not the counter-claim pleading in the this matter suggested that the obligations of probation have been settled in favor of the USA? Has not the administrative record in support of the counter-claim pleading that has been certified by third party show the restitution has been discharged? Has not the respondent contractually ratified the compulsory counterclaim? What do you want? Are we not here today based on the Defendants Motion for Entry of Default Judgment for settlement and closure of the matter to discharge all obligations, duties and accounts in favor of the United States? Does the court at this time require any more assistance from me, or is this matter ready for determination In Chambers based on the record submitted for determination and issuance of a public order? Is it not true that there is no disagreement as to the facts and we are submitting to the court on an issue of law? Are you not willing to accept my consideration to follow up my offer to make the U.S. whole in this matter? Are you telling me that documents under seal by Notary Public pursuant to an act of congress, whereas a Notary Public has the powers ofa Justice of the Peace to certify evidence under the rules of evidence in this court is not going to be honored in the private sector? Do the documents not show by evidence of a foreign proceeding that the private trust has brought forth settlement and closure of The Matter and is now awaiting public trust ratification? Are you compelling a foreign trustee to appear in your jurisdiction in order to waive the claim of the

foreign private trust without adequate compensation? Has this tribunal received the foreign record submitted to it in The Matter under the provisions of international treaty and private international law subject to the statutes of the USA's act of 1850 granting Notary Publics the capacity to take evidence in The Matter and forward such evidence in behalf of the private trust for processing in the public trust? Didn't JB the fact fmder relay to you a copy of the material sent to... if the tribunal lacks a copy of that document may 1 provide a copy of that part ofthe record that was submitted to the fact finder to the bailiff to give to you? Is it really possible to have a substantive right protected by way of a decision in a public session? Are you telling me that the only provision for settlement and closure is via the provisions of the public trust when an alternative settlement from the private trust may be more beneficial to all the parties in The Matter and would make those appearances of which you spoke moot providing more efficient use of public resources? "HOW CAN I HELP YOU? I am not wanting anything from the public trust I am here to help you! Are you saying you are denying me a remedy which provides settlement for aJl parties without prejudice? If the matter is deemed to be closed is that test relevant anymore since has not the parties been made whole and hasn't all duties and obligations been extinguished? Unless you can show cause why this matter has not been settled Can you not show me why by the actions pursuant to the record ofthe Certificate of Protest the US has not been made whole in this matter. suffers no prejudice and has no fol~ow up claim Are you compelling to specific perfonnance along public policy instead of private resolution? Are you compelling me to involuntary servitude when I've offered voluntary servitude to resolve The Matter? If you have the capacity to resolve this, issue to me a receipt or document showing The Matter is closed and the Defendant is released from all probation obligation in The Matter. In the a1ternative if you do not have the authority to issue said documents establish an In Chambers proceeding with an officer who has the authority to review the record and authorize the settlement & closure of The Matter. Has the Certificate of Protest been denied by any Public Official? Do you have the capacity to order me to perfonn any specific obligation to which the Certificate of Protest attaches? Do you have the authority to compel me to perform any obligation under the The Matter to which an Agent afthe SOS has issued this Certificate ofPratest at which an Agent of the USA has indicated

that The Matter has been settled and closed and that further performance is unnecessary? I cannot perfonn unless you show that you have the authority to overrule an Agent afthe SOS! File this with the previous record submitted to you as part of an augmented record. Are you telling me this matter is not closed? Has the private record submitted to this tribunal through the agent of the SOS not provided factual knowledge of complete settlement between the private trustee and the Plaintiff beneficiary as trust law so requires? Are you testifying from the bench? Your honor am I not here in this private capacity to assist you in providing you adequate and complete remedy in making the plaintiff beneficiary of the private trust whole in the matter for which the beneficiary has charged/complained. Do you also understand what I have just told you? Do you also realize with the settlement and closure I am providing through my private remedy that the public trust will be made whole and it will have won a private supporter who is working in perfect harmony for the good of both the public and private trust? Is there any further questions or issues that I may assist this tribunal with or am I free to leave? If it please the court would it be OK if pursuant to settling The Matter by way of the foreign record I give you a phone # & location so that if my assistance is necessary to assist you settling and closing this matter you can contact me? I would like to assist on the matter have you not received infonnation from probation or the court that this matter is in for settlement & closure and these tests would then be moot? I am appearing specially and not generally, may I enter the bar as a foreign party to assist in the settlement & closure of this matter? Your honor do you need my assistance as the foreign party in further settlement of this matter? Is it not proper for the foreign agent to have someone present at these proceedings to help with settlement and closure? I am the private trustee in this matler identified in the in the foreign documents before this tribunal! Your honor, if you were to make that order in violation of the evidence before this tribunal under foreign seal would it not create a constitutional tort by violation of the foreign private trust's right to the property free of public taking without just compensation? If I were to answer your question and give you legal advice would 1 not be changing my status as foreign private trustee and thereby abandon my position to the public and thereby waive my claim of constitutional tort if you gave that oder which you talked about?

COMMERCE: concealment and warfare May you not refer to me as the servant of "I Am"? Was the great "I Am" not identified in many great history books handed down to civilized mankind? Art thou not saying then who 1 am? May I not appear here as foreign private trustee to observe and assist in settlement of this matter? If I were to give you my name would you not assume that I am generally appearing in public to grant my private rights, titles, and interests therein back to the public INSTEAD OF AS FOREIGN PRIVATE TRUSTEE HERE TO ASSIST [N SETfLEMENT AND CLOSURE OF THIS MATTER ON THE PRIVATE SIDE? For the purpose of being able to assist you in private ... Do I have the capacity to infonn you in the public trust what you should or should not do without abandoning my position in the private trust without adequate compensation? Are you compelling me to perfonn to the public trust without adequate compensation to the private trust? Have you had a chance to review the material and settle and close this account or do you need to pass the material on to another pay for settlement an closure? Would it be helpful your honor if I gave you a local phone # and location so that if this tribunal needs more information or assistance in settling and closing this matter you may contact me in private. If I am involved in working with you in the public trust am I not deemed to have waived my substantive rights in the private trust and are you going to compensate me for the loss of my substantive rights? Have you established a new claim upon which you are requesting perfonnance? How is that relevant to the current issue have you not settled and closed The Matter making the location of my whereabouts moot to the public trust? How can the private trustee answer questions of a public trustee without re-granting unalienable substantive rights back to the public trust without adequate compensation Can you compel me to waive my substantive rights in the private trust without adequate compensation and without voluntary servitude? Is an obligation and duty under the old determination or relationship of the parties necessary if the new settlement has closed the matter and the U.S. or all parties have been made whole so that no further obligations are required by either party under the old relationship?

Have I not shown where the U.S. has not now received sufficient compensation to close the public obligation in the matter? Has there been an official determination made in writing that the private record has failed to compensate the U.S. in the matter? Where is their written record and what rights do I have on administrative appeal? If I perform what you want how will the public trust provide me with adequate compensation for the service rendered? Has not the private record shown that the public has received adequate compensation to settle and close the matter such that further performance of any obligation by the private trust is unnecessary because the matter has been settled? Is there any record of evidence that appears in this tribunal contrary to the certified evidence that has been brought into these proceedings and are you strongly suggesting that if you put the Defendant in jail without evidence to set aside the private claim that doesnt constitute a constitutional tort? Can you compel me to grant my private claim to the public without just compensation? Has not the Notary Public put due presentment before the department and the court system handling the matter? Does not now the agency or court system having the responsibility of having been given due presentment to either schedule a hearing for review of the matter for acceptance and closure of the matter or a response to inform me of any appellate proceedings and requirement for review of this public dishonor? Are you denying a procedural or substantive remedy from denial of due presentment? Is it not true there is both a public and private trust that run parallel in todays society? Is it not true that the public has not enough resources to resolve all problems in private Is it not true the only reason the public trustees are involved in remedy for any problems is that the private parties have failed to resolve it? Is it not true that most problems the public has is a result of private parties taking responsibility and failing to resolve the matter so that the public resources do not have to be wasted? Are you suggesting the record I provided to you did resolve the matter in private still grants jurisdiction in the public trust to continue a matter already settled wasting more public resources? Is it not true before decision comes down from probation I need to remain in the private seclor doing my duties to protect the remedies of all parties to which my remedies have given full satisfaction pursuant to the record? Am I not asking you questions not to understand how I am to help you while remaining in the private sector to provide those remedies? Why are you continuing to remain in the public sector where the matter has not been resolved while you have evidence of a record from the private trust setting forth sealed evidence that the matter has

been settled and closed in the private? Have you received the certificate of protest record? Do you have the authority to ratify that record for public acceptance and if you do can you send me a receipt showing settlement and closure? Are you prepared to submit that record to a superior for public acceptance and ratification or have you issued an official detennination with respect to that record and if the detennination is adverse to the record are you prepared to issue to me information as to appellate rights? Do you have the authority to proceed since you have received notice of a Notary protest over my objection? May I request you take that before your superior and I will be pleased to attend! JUDGE: Your Honor, are you telling me that you are going to deny my private remedy and compel me into performing on a public remedy by presumed voluntary consent as a constitutional tort without just compensation? Are you suggesting that you have sufficient insurance coverage or are bonded to compensate a private party for a constitutional tort when you issue an order contrary to the private interest to which a record supports that the private has settled and closed an account in private and public and there being no damaged party in public that has brought forth a claim? Are we not here on my petition as a right that stands in the nature of an administrative appeal for failure of the agency to close this matter under my administrative procedure? Can new evidence be introduced on appeal? Your Honor, can I not appear here today with a petition for appellate review of an administrative procedure dealing with substantive rights of title to have an appeal in the nature of a declaratory judgment to show rights and relationships of the parties in the settlement and closure of the commercial matter styled as USA v. John Doe criminal case # ___ and USA v. JOHN DOE case # ___ and any subsequest orders, fines, costs, penalties, duties, obligations, etc., including but not limited to probation/ supervised release? Did the US submit a record to this hearing to rebut the record that the petitioner has brought for public acceptance at this hearing? Is it not true if I volunteered on the public side matter does that moot my petitioner? Can you give me complete written assurance that my participation with you under the public side will not convey or re-grant my unalienable right back to the public I would be happy to participate.

Are you requesting I do this before I get a resolution from the tribunal that I obey an order under the old public trust of the matter and would that not moot the private trust settlement that is before the magistrate for public trust ratification? Are you trying to get me to grant the private settlement and resolution on the private side back to the public without just compensation? Would this make my petition moot? Youre correct, isnt it true it takes two witnesses to come together to have an agreement to anything? Isnt it also true that the record that has been received by you via due presentment is merely a ratification in the private and isnt it true the public acceptance and ratification is necessary to create final acceptance for settlement and closure but this public acceptance should be forthcoming based upon the record tendered by due presentment unless the public shows by a record in the public that the evidence via the due presentment is insufficient to settle and close the matter? What is this latter rogatory? I CA your offer to explain what the LR is UPOC that the prosecutor does not understand the letter or there is case left to be settled Are you claiming this private settlement is good in here? I CA your offer that the private settlement is goo in here UPOC that here is any business left on this issue Are you saying the court has to respond to all this papenvork you put in here? J CA your offer that I am saying anything UPOC that the the matter is not already settled. What would you like done with this LR? I CA your offer to ... UPOC that the parties that received it have not yet settled and closed he matter. Mam! Was this letter rogatory done by your attorney I CAyour offer to tell you who wrote the LR UPOC that this matter is not already settled and closed. Or that what happens in private is relevant in the public. I'm sorry to tell you the DA has rejected your offer to settle in the private? I CA your offer to notify me of the DAis dishonor UPOC that this court should not now have the notary to certify the DA's dishonor. We're going to proceed to trial regardless of all this paperwork stuff you've done! 1CA your offer to to go to trial UPOC that I haven't already agreed to cover whatever amount is assessed. I want you to stop saying that I CA UPOC etc. or I will hold you in contempt. I CA your offer to hold me in contempt UPOC that A CA is a contemptible act

You might also like