Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kenneth Butler
VIKEN and Associates / Kotamadya Bekasi
1
Konsep pengelolaan sumberdaya
lahan TPA
Siklus Sampah Perkotaan Negara Maju
2
Konsep pengelolaan sumberdaya
lahan TPA
Siklus Sampah Perkotaan Negara Transisi
4
Bekasi Methane Gas
Destruction and Landfill
Organic Recovery
6
Project Objectives
Avoidance of present and future methane emission from
the City of Bekasi landfill, TPA Sumur Batu, through;
1. Methane gas flaring and small scale electricity
generation, and
2. Removal of decomposing organics from the landfill for
sales as compost avoiding future methane gas production.
Recycling the existing landfill to provide sustainable solid
waste disposal, protecting the local environment and
health impacts on the local community and improved
collection services in the city.
7
Additional Objectives
Provision of an appropriate and sustainable solution to
MSWM problems through the implementation a new
landfill management system,
Improved solid waste collection service and disposal,
Reduction of environmental, social and health impacts of
solid waste disposal,
Improvement in conditions for the non organic recycling
community,
8
Project Location
TPA Sumur Batu
Kotamadya Bekasi
DKI Jakarta
LPA Bantargebang
9
Baseline data
Population 1.9 million
MSW generated approx 1,360
tonne / day
Collection and disposal approx.
30% of MSW generated.
Target of improving collection
service to 80% within 5 years
TPA Sumur Batu:
Area 10 hectares
Opened mid 2002
Capacity approx. 2 million m3
Approx 200,000 tonnes in place
to December 2005
Potential methane generation from
2002 – 2019 waste disposal =
522,000 tonne
C02equivalent during project years
2006 – 2019 = 11 million tonne
10
Project Components
Methane generation in landfills generally follows two
phases, initial rapid degradation with a peak of
methane production within approximately 4 to 5 years
and a slower or decelerated rate of methane
production that can last many decades.
This project will deal with both stage of methane
generation via;
Methane capture and destruction, dealing with
methane production as it occurs, and
Organic recovery, avoiding future methane
production during the slower stage through the
removal of all organic carbon sources from the
anaerobic environment of the landfill.
Methane Gas flaring component will be implemented
first.
11
Forecast Abatement from CDM
Project
Total emission abatement over 2006 – 2019 =
5.7 million tonne CO2equivalent
12
Estimated Initial Flaring Investment
Cost ($US) Cost (Rp)
1 Flaring Facility
LFG Flaring Equipment (2200 SCFM Facility) $ 143,000 1,358,500,000
Spare Parts $ 6,000 57,000,000
Shipping USA to Jakarta ( 1 x 40ft container) $ 10,000 95,000,000
Import and other taxs and charges (50% of Equipment Cost) $ 71,500 679,250,000
Local transportation Jkt to Bks $ 750 7,125,000
Installation and commissioning $ 18,000 171,000,000
Technical/Operational Training $ 4,000 38,000,000
Documentation $ 500 4,750,000
Maintenance Agreement (per year) $ 12,000 114,000,000
Site Facility/Building $ 5,000 47,500,000
Insurance (2.5% of Equipment Cost) $ 3,575 33,962,500
sub total $ 274,325 2,606,087,500
2 Emissions Monitoring
Monitoring Equipment (equipment, installation, commissioning) $ 30,000 285,000,000
Monitoring, Reporting Agreement and Maintenance (per year) $ 25,000 237,500,000
sub total $ 55,000 522,500,000
15
Relevant issues of CDM
16
Typical CDM Project Cycle
Preparation and Review of the Project
•Submission of the Project Information Note (PIN)
Project completion
3m
ont Carbon Asset Due Diligence
h
rs
•Development of the Project Design Document (PDD)
PIN
a
ye
21
to
2m
up
onth
?
Validation process
1–3
th
on
3 mon 2m
th Project Appraisal and Negotiation
•Signing of Emissions Reductions
Construction and Start up Purchase Agreement (ERPA)
rs
h •Development of the Project Design Document (PDD)
by a Carbon Financing
a
ye
21
to
Institution (CFI).
2m
up
onth
A Letter of Intent to
further develop the Validation process
1–3
th
expected from the CFI on
on
the acceptance of the 3 mon 2m
th Project Appraisal and Negotiation
21
The Next Step
22
Typical CDM Project Cycle
Preparation and Review of the Project
•Submission of the Project Information Note (PIN)
Project completion
3m
ont Carbon Asset Due Diligence
h
rs
•Development of the Project Design Document (PDD)
a
ye D
21
to
PD
2m
up
onth
Validation process
1–3
th
on
3 mon 2m
th Project Appraisal and Negotiation
•Signing of Emissions Reductions
Construction and Start up Purchase Agreement (ERPA)
rs
•Development of the Project Design Document (PDD)
a
ye
Feasibility Study to
21
2m
up
Baseline and
onth
Additionality
Validation process
1–3
th
Monitoring Quality
on
Assurance Plan 3 mon 2m
th Project Appraisal and Negotiation
•Signing of Emissions Reductions
Environmental and Social Purchase Agreement (ERPA)
Impact Assessment
Community Consultation
Source: adapted from Carbon Finance Branch, World Bank 2005 24
Activities and Responsibilities of
PDD Development Stage
Financing the PDD
Financial and resources requirements would be determined
prior to signing LOI and MOU between all parties. This
would normally be determine based upon future ownership of
the CER’s generated.
In some instances the CFI would bear the initial costs of the
PDD development. These cost recovered once the project is
generating CER’s.
Normally the CFI takes responsibility due diligence,
coordination with DNA and potential CER’s buyers.
Cost estimates for PDD; $US180,000 - $250,000 which
would include all associated CDM registration fees
25
Activities and Responsibilities of
PDD Development Stage
Community Consultation
This is an important component of CDM and the PDD and
should commence once the project has reached the LOI
point,
All stakeholders must be made aware of the project and
provided a forum in which to comment and input into the
project design,
This is especially important during the earlier stages of CDM
development in Indonesia,
Local government has the prime responsibility to ensure the
quality and openness of this process. Even when the project
is wholly undertaken by the private sector,
Poorly communicated projects are unlikely to be certified or 26
Typical CDM Project Cycle
Preparation and Review of the Project
•Submission of the Project Information Note (PIN)
Project completion
3m
ont Carbon Asset Due Diligence
h
rs
•Development of the Project Design Document (PDD)
a
ye
21
to
2m
up
onth
PD Validation process
1–3
th
on
3 mon 2m
th Project Appraisal and Negotiation
•Signing of Emissions Reductions
Construction and Start up Purchase Agreement (ERPA)
rs
•Development of the Project Design Document (PDD)
a
ye
21
is normally determined based
to
2m
up
onth
The ERPA is a long term PD Validation process
purchase and delivery
1–3
commitment.
years
th
on
2m
Monitoring project
3 Project Appraisal and Negotiation
CER’s must have a “quality month •Signing of Emissions Reductions
Purchase Agreement (ERPA)
process”
29
Project Implementation
30