Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1


Ratings: (0)|Views: 77|Likes:
Published by J Doe

More info:

Published by: J Doe on Jul 10, 2012
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTMIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDAFORT MYERS DIVISIONNU IMAGE, INC.,Plaintiff,vs.Case No. 2:11-cv-545-FtM-29SPCDOES 1-3,932,Defendant.___________________________________
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s Motion forClarification (Doc. #255) filed on June 25, 2012. Plaintiff arguesthat the Court’s May 24, 2012 Order (Doc. #246) “[p]resumably”granted the motions to quash only as to those individuals who filedmotions challenging personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff argues thatthe Order “was constructed without such specific wording” resultingin different interpretations by plaintiff’s counsel and a third-party served with a subpoena. Plaintiff seeks clarification aswhether the Order quashed the subpoena as to Doe #545 only, orotherwise.On May 23, 2012, the Court issued an Opinion and Order (Doc.#244) addressing the Motion to Quash or, in the Alternative, Motionto Dismiss and/or Sever filed by John Doe #1, but applying the samereasoning to other pending motions. The Court found that the
Case 2:11-cv-00545-JES-SPC Document 271 Filed 07/10/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID 2624

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->