IN THESUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________________________________
Case No. 11-10814
_________________________________________
In re
DR. LINDA LORINCZ SHELTON,
Petitioner
_________________________________________ DR LINDA LORINCZ SHELTON,
Plaintiff - Petitioner,
v. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ANDHONORABLE JUDGE PEGGY CHIAMPOS
,Defendant - Respondent.
______________________________________________________________
SCR 15(8) & 20(2) SUPPLEMENT TOPETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ____________________________________________________________
DR LINDA LORINCZ SHELTONXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.Oak Lawn, IL 60453-3539(708) 952-9040
Petitioner, Pro Se
SCR 15(8) & 20(2) SUPPLEMENT TOPETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
NOW COMES, Petitioner (“Shelton”) who respectfully supplements herPetition for writ of Mandamus, in order to keep this Honorable Court updatedas to status of all issues, as well as to include two (2) more Questions or Issuesfor the Court,
required as a result of the direct and recent actions of Respondents
:
i
ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW RESULTING FROMACTIONS OF RESPONDENT
9.
May the Circuit Court of Cook County (“CCCC”), on misdemeanorcases, refuse to issue a case number, docket, file, and schedule forhearing in a timely fashion a petition for writ of habeas corpus or isthis a violation of the Suspension Clause of the United StatesConstitution, a violation of 14
th
Amendment right to due process anda violation of Illinois Statutes, 735 ILCS Article X?
10.
May the Federal District Court summarily, without a due processevidentiary hearing or further briefing, dismiss a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, when the defendant claimsviolation of the 4
th
Amendment right to be free of arrest withoutprobable cause, violation of the 6
th
Amendment right to speedy trial,gives detailed dates and evidence from the docket and court ordersproving that speedy trial has been violated, but on the initial formrequesting a writ of habeas corpus only cites Illinois Statutes andcase law, fails to state her stricken motion for dismissal due tospeedy trial violations has federal case law, states no federal caselaw, but cites the 6
th
Amendment or is this a violation of thedefendant’s 6
th
Amendment right to speedy trial as applied by 28U.S.C. § 2241, 14
th
Amendment right to due process, and thesuspension clause, as violation of speedy trial means that thedefendant is being tried without jurisdiction?
ii
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
Supplement to Petition for Writ of Mandamus to U.S. Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court requires that petitioners keep the court informed of changes concerning the issues. One does this by way of a "Supplement" to the petition. This is my supplement to my Petition for Writ…
(More)
1.2K
Reads
20
Readcasts
90
Embed Views
Recommended
More From This User
Notes
Load more
