The bombing of Dresden was not an act of genocide; it was not an attempt to exterminate the German people and this is quite obvious. The number of casualties was not bigger than the bombing of London by the nazis and even the denier David Irving agrees. The short-lived boycott of German goods by a few business owners because of nazi hatred towards jews is not an act of genocide either. Or would you call islamic boycott of Danish goods genocide? What's more, the nazis immediately retaliated with a boycott of jewish goods and jewish organizations soon agreed to end it in exchange for jewish lives. Forensic testing of the gas chambers done by the Institute for Forensic Research in Cracow indicated the presence of cyanide in greater quantities than the buildings which were fumigated a few times with Zyklon B. This shows the impossibility of the denier claim that the gas chambers were just morgues which were occasionally fumigated. I'm convinced they were gas chambers because of the nazi documents describing them as gas chambers and the testimony of both prisoners and SS personnel. There's no bias or conspiracy, history is the work of thousands of historians who have ideological differences and they have reached a consensus. As in science, the burden of proof lies on those who defy the accepted consensus. There's heaps of evidence backing this historical consensus and your unawareness of it is irrelevant. The burden of proof is on those who make outrageous claims which deny common knowledge. You have NOT done your research properly. I have reviewed the documents in question many times. I won't do your research for you. Google it or visit your local library. And please spare me the usual "inquisitive mind" strategy of deniers. Your comments on other documents show your anti-semitism as the real motive behind your assertions.