The Carbon Footprint of Email Spam Report
•
An estimated worldwide total o
62 trillion spamemails
were sent in 2008
•
Globally, annual spam energy use totals 33billion kilowatt-hours (KWh), or 33 terawatt hours(TWh). That’s equivalent to the electricity used in
2.4 million homes in the United States,
with thesame GHG emissions as 3.1 million passenger carsusing two billion United States gallons o gasoline
•
Spam iltering saves 135 TWh o electricity peryear. That’s like taking
13 million cars
o the road
•
I every inbox were protected by a state-o-the-art spam ilter, organizations and individuals couldreduce today’s spam energy by approximately75 percent or 25 TWh per year. That’s equivalentto taking
2.3 million cars
o the road
•
The average GHG emission associated with asingle spam message is 0.3 grams o CO
2
. That’slike driving three eet (one meter) in equivalentemissions, but when multiplied by the annualvolume o spam, it’s like
driving around theEarth 1.6 million times
•
A year’s email at a typical medium-size businessuses 50,000 KWh; more than
one ith o that annual use can be associated with spam
•
Filtering spam is beneicial, but ighting spamat the source is even better. When McColo,a major source o online spam, was taken olinein late 2008, the energy saved in the ensuinglull — beore spammers rebuilt their sendingcapacity — equated to taking
2.2 million cars
o the road
•
Much o the energy consumption associatedwith spam (52 percent) comes rom end-usersdeleting spam and searching or legitimate email(alse positives).
Spam iltering accounts or just 16 percent o spam-related energy use
Key Findings
Abstract
1
Summary
1
A Day without Spam
2
The Carbon Footprint o Spam
3
Conclusion
8
Reerences
9
CONTENTS
Leave a Comment