International Journal on Governmental Financial Management – 2008 93
•
identifies the characteristics of financial management systems reform that can assist inimproving the measurement of government sector performance;
•
gives an overview of the Basic Requirements Model; and
•
makes an attempt to develop the General Model for Government Sector Reform.
New Zealand’s Government Sector Reforms
Background to, and context of, the reforms.
The government sector reform is now aworldwide phenomenon, as governments grapple with rapid social, economic andtechnological change, including the effects of globalization. While globalization is themost important reason underlying government sector reform in the world, poor economic performance was the impetus for the New Zealand government sector reform. In order to better understand the background of the government sector reform initiatives in NewZealand, the economic situation leading up to the 1984 economic crisis will be brieflydiscussed.From the 1960s to 1980, there was a notable decline in the performance of the NewZealand economy compared with other OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operationand Development) countries. Per capita, income grew just 1.4 percent per annum comparedto 2.9 percent for the OECD as a whole (OECD 1993:p.11). Moreover, over the same period, the Gross National Product per capita fell from fifth in the world to the twentieth in1980s. The main reason behind this decline was that the productivity of capital and labor was growing more slowly than the OECD average. The economic policies of the NewZealand government, from 1975 to 1984, have been characterized as:
“…
a heavy reliance on particular forms of interventions in the economy… [that did] not achieve their objectives and frustrated the achievement of higher living standards.”(TheTreasury 1984:p.106).
Many reasons have been given for the poor use of resources, low productivity and lowgrowth at this time. These include:
•
inefficient and inequitable tax system
: the tax system emboldened unproductiveinvestments and burdened individuals with a high marginal tax rate (66 percent),although it did ensure that New Zealand was a relatively equitable society;
•
distortion in the price system
: through regulations, subsidies and taxes, the entire pricesystem in New Zealand had been distorted away from reflecting the true value of goods, services, labor and capital. This price distortion and poor macroeconomic policymeant that New lost its competitive ability in the external market.
•
effects of tariffs and controls
: high tariffs and import controls provided high levels of assistance to domestic industry, but they also raised the costs of the export industry.
Leave a Comment