TABLEOFCONTENTS
1.
INTRODUCTIONIII.STATEMENTOFRELEVANTFACTS4
A.
EventsLeadingup
to
Appellants'Filing
ofthe
Action4
B.
TheJanuary26,2009WrittenAssent...5
C.
AppellantsUnsuccessfullyAttempt
to
EnjoinSAGfromActingPursuant
to
theWrittenAssent...7D.SAGHoldsaSpecialMeeting
to
Reaffirn1theActsPassedbytheJanuary26,2009WrittenAssent..8
E.
AppellantsUnsuccessfullySeekExpedited"Extraordinary"WritReview
in
ThisCourt...
10
F.
SAG'sMembershipOverwhelminglyVotestoRatifyaNewContractwiththeAMPTP
II
III.THETRIALCOURTDIDNOTABUSEITSDISCRETION
IN
DENYINGAPPELLANTS'EXPARTEAPPLICATIONFORATEMPORARYRESTRAININGORDER
II
A.
TheTrialCourt'sOrderDidNot"ExceedtheBounds
of
Reason"
II
B.
CaliforniaLawAuthorizesSAG'sEnactment
of
BylawsthatGovernVotingProcedures
12
C.
SAG'sMajority-VoteWrittenAssentProcedureDoesNotConflictWithSection7211(b)
16
D.
TheTasksAccomplishedbytheMajority-VoteWrittenAssentDoNotConflictWithSAG'sBylaws
19
E.
PublicPolicyWeighsHeavilyAgainstCourtInvolvement
in
InternecineIssues
21
F.
Appellants'RequestedTemporaryRestrainingOrderWasFlawed24IV.THEAPPEALSHOULDBEDISMISSED
AS
MOOT
25
V.
CONCLUSION
31
AI7J023949.5
Add a Comment