do this.In my journey into music I have been much helped by good fortune. As a child I may have beenmusically underprivileged (though no more so than most children) but I was in all other ways privileged. My parents (like their parents) were well-off; we lived in suburbs, not musically verylively but in all other ways easy and comfortable. I went to a "good" boarding school and college.As an adult I have been even more fortunate. If by choice I have lived much of my life with verylittle money, so that I could do work I believed in, I have also lived without many worries aboutmoney. This was partly because, though not through choice, or at least not my choice, I never married. Also, like most people who grow up rich, I never really believed that economic disaster could strike me. I know the dangers of poverty, as I know the dangers of the atomic bomb, butthey have never been real to me in the way they are to people who have been poor, or to thesurvivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Which is not to say, either, that poor people cannot learn tolove music, or even to become musicians, even great musicians. Many have done so, and some arenow doing so. J.B. Priestley once wrote that the working-class people he grew up with inYorkshire knew more about music, and made more music, than the much richer working class otoday. But it is certainly easier to explore, enjoy, and make music, as it is to do anything else, ione is not constantly worrying about money, and can afford such things as concerts, records,instruments, practice space, and lessons. The lack of these is one of the reasons why, to name justone example, the Greater Boston Youth Symphony hardly ever has in it any children from Boston.What we need to do, of course, is to make musical resources more available to people with littlemoney.A few years ago I read in the British magazine
The Gramophone
a short article about the notedGerman conductor Eugen lochum. The article said that he had grown up in a town in Germanywith a population of about two thousand, and that in that town there had been a symphonyorchestra of 75 players and a mixed chorus of 150, who played and sang much of the great music.It may well be that this town was not typical, and that not every little German town had musicmalting on this level. Still, if we had only one tenth this much music making here in Boston (or any town or city), we would have an orchestra in every neighborhood, and many quartets andchamber groups in every block. What a city, what a country that would be to live in! I would liketo do all I can to bring that city and that country closer.Another reason I am writing this book is to question the widely held idea that what happens to usin the first few years of our lives determines everything that will happen later, what we can be,what we can do. Musical people am particularly prone to talk this way. The great Japanese stringteacher Suzulri, whose work I have long admired, writes in his books that if children do not hear,almost from birth, good music (by which he means classical music), if they hear, in short, the kindof popular music that was all I heard as a child, they will grow up tone deaf. Not so. Countlessother teachers say that if we don't learn to play musical instruments as children we will never beable to learn as adults. Again, not so. Of course it is nice, if we come freely to music, to come to ityoung, but if we don't come to it then, we can later, it is never too late. And while there may begood grounds for saying that some music is "better" than other music--I happen to think thatBeethoven is better than Hummel, Tchaikovsky better than Clazounov, Stravinsky better thanJohn Cage, and Duke Ellington better than Glenn Miller--these distinctions have nothing to dowith learning to love music. "Bad" music is not the enemy of "good" music. The world of music isvery large, and all one piece; there are a great many roads into it. As long as we have access to allof it, and the right to explore it freely, making our judgments as we go, each of us can find his or
Add a Comment