• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
Download
 
M. G. Hysell
Deaf Candidates to Holy Orders:Impediment or Opportunity?
1
 
 Newman Theological CollegeEdmonton, Alberta, Canada
Deaf Candidates to Holy Orders:Impediment or Opportunity?
 M. G. Hysell, M.A., M.Th. (Cand.)Submitted toRevd. Fr. Roger Keeler, J.C.D.MPS-565: Introduction to Canon Law10 April, Winter Semester 2008Revised 18 April 2008© 2008 All rights reserved
 
M. G. Hysell
Deaf Candidates to Holy Orders:Impediment or Opportunity?
2
Introduction
On 1 January 2008, Fr. Edward McNamara, professor of sacred liturgy at the Legion of Christ’s
 Regina Apostolorum
University in Rome received the following question from a certain “M.D”in Belleville, Ontario: “Will there ever be a day when the deaf will be allowed to enter convents,monasteries, for the religious life? When all Catholic churches will have American SignLanguage and closed-captioning available for the Mass? I believe even the deaf are equal beforeGod and should be equal before the Church.”
1
 In many ways, the question is an astonishing one. In Canada, the
Sisters of Our Lady of Seven Dolors
was founded in 1851 by the Sisters Providence as a vowed religious communityfor Deaf 
2
Catholic women. Toward the end of the nineteenth century,
 La Piccola Missione per iSordomuti
was founded by the Servant of God Fr. Guiseppe Gualdani; the congregation received papal approbation in 1913. In 1927, the Clerics of St. Viator founded an Oblate branch for Deaf men with a vocation to the religious brotherhood. Recently, in Spain, a group of Deaf monks,following the Rule of St. Benedict,
Monjes sordos de Effatha
.In 1997, H.Em. John Cardinal O’Connor, in consultation with the Congregation for Catholic Education (then presided by Pio Cardinal Laghi) formally established the
 DePaul  House of Studies for Deaf Seminarians
at 375 Park Avenue in Yonkers, New York, as a house of residence for Deaf candidates to ministerial orders. Common life, the celebration of the sacred
1
On the Web athttp://www.zenit.org/article-21400?l=english, accessed 11 January 2008.
2
The distinction between “
eaf” and “
 D
eaf” is one of ‘handicap’ and ‘culture,’ respectively. A
eaf person issomeone who experiences a significant range of hearing loss (at the lower three levels—moderate, severe, and profound), distinguished from ‘hard-of-hearing,’ and may or may not know sign language. In other words,
eafnessis more or less a medical classification. The designation
 D
eaf, on the other hand, refers to the culture of people whoshare the common experience of deafness either by parentage, personal hearing loss, or even enculturation into theDeaf community (e.g. sign language interpreters). While a deaf person may either be Oralist, use manually codedEnglish, ‘Total Communication’ (= speaking
and 
signing at the same time), she may not necessarily identify withDeaf culture. On the other hand,
all 
Deaf people are deaf. It is important to be aware that the Deaf culture, inaddition to its own language (which varies from country to country), has its own mores, forms of entertainment, andsocial milieu.
 
M. G. Hysell
Deaf Candidates to Holy Orders:Impediment or Opportunity?
3liturgy, and recreation would take place at the DePaul House but the seminarians wouldcommute to St. Joseph’s Seminary (Dunwoodie) for classes, retreats, and formation.
3
During thesame time, the Director, V. Revd.. Thomas Coughlin, was in the process of founding a religiouscommunity of Deaf men under the patronage of the Order of Preachers. In 2002, the DePaulHouse relocated to San Francisco, becoming attached to St. Patrick’s Seminary and University.Then, in 2007, the DePaul House relocated again to San Antonio, Texas, at the invitation of Archbishop José Gomez and the Oblate School of Theology. Obviously, the question posed byM.D. to Fr. McNamara is a dated one.In responding to M.D.’s query, Fr. McNamara maneuvered around the more crucialquestions of impediments, suitability, and defects. As one commentator observed, “Fr..McNamara was clearly writing out of his depth on this topic. He gave a well-meaning, off-the-top-of-his-head answer to the questions posed to him without displaying familiarity with therelevant Church documents…”
4
Dr. Edward Peters, professor of Canon law at Sacred HeartMajor Seminary in Detroit, offered a devastating critique
5
of not only Fr. McNamara’s handlingof the question, but also his apparent lack of expertise in citing the appropriate canons to answer M.D.Two issues must be raised in regard to M.D.’s question: whether deafness can beconsidered a kind of poor physical health such that it constitutes an irregularity or impediment to
3
See H.Em. John Cardinal O’Connor, “The Possibility of Becoming Priests,” on the Web athttp://www.cny.org/archive/cv/cv031298.htm, accessed 10 April 2008.
 
4
On the Web athttp://jimmyakin.typepad.com/defensor_fidei/2008/01/deaf-people-and.html, accessed 9 April2008.
5
On the Web athttp://www.canonlaw.info/2008/01/to-best-accomodate-deaf-begin-by.html, accessed 4 April2008.
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...