Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Taitz V Nishimura - Mandamus - Denined

    Uploaded by

    Mike Dunford
    165 views2 pages
    Dr. Orly Taitz's petition for a writ of mandamus fails to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. Petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief and lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Taitz v Nishimura - Mandamus - Denined

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Dr. Orly Taitz's petition for a writ of mandamus fails to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. Petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief and lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    165 views2 pages

    Taitz V Nishimura - Mandamus - Denined

    Uploaded by

    Mike Dunford
    Dr. Orly Taitz's petition for a writ of mandamus fails to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. Petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief and lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-12-0000014 12-JAN-2012 12:52 PM

    NO. SCPW-12-0000014 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I DR. ORLY TAITZ, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE RHONDA A. NISHIMURA, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.) Upon consideration of petitioner Dr. Orly Taitz's petition for a writ of mandamus, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. See Kema v.

    Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action. Such writs are not

    intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the lower courts, nor are they intended to serve as legal remedies in lieu of normal appellate procedures. ). Accordingly,

    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 12, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

    You might also like