November 12, 2008
2
Cafeteria services better this year, says college
I have received some questions
and comments from students following an articlethat appeared in Nexus [
Aramark underwhelms
students,
Oct. 15 issue].
I would like to share excerpts of my responses,
to broaden the understanding of the college’srelationship with Aramark.
Prices: Food prices in the last six months have
been affected by rising fuel costs, grain costs in
Asia, and general food cost increases. The pricesfor food in our Lansdowne Caf and at the Urban
Diner at Interurban are pretty competitive, andwith lots of choices at different price-points.
Lineups: Aramark is aware of the congestionand lineup issue and is trying different strategies
to address it. Wages: The staff is paid a wage above the
industry standard. Aramark has attracted a chef
from the Fireside Grill (at Urban Diner) sincethe conditions are so good here (decent hours,decent wages, and benets)!Contract and length: Camosun undertooka formal, competitive Request for Proposalsprocess last spring to be in a position to selectthe best food service provider for our needs.Camosun’s expectations for a food service pro-
vider included, among other important food ser-vice requirements, a sizeable capital investment,
so the college could direct its limited resourcesto educational needs of our students. For thefood service provider to be able to justify thatcapital investment, they needed to be assuredthey would be able to recoup that investmentover a reasonable period of time. Eight yearswas that term.Overall, the variety and food offered in our
Campus Caf and Urban Diner has increased this
year. We see this not only on the “shelves,” but
through increased sales. Aramark is committedto continual improvement on the service, quality,
and variety.
Donna Burger, Aramark’s Food Service Dir-ector for Camosun, would be pleased to addressspecic comments or concerns (250–370–3650,or in person in the Campus Caf). The college will
undertake a survey of the food services early inthe new year.
Kathryn Le Gros
Director, AncillAry ServiceScAmoSun college
No easy solution forhomeless
In response to Christopher Gillespie’s column
[
Students should speak up about homelessness,
Oct. 29 issue], homelessness has been a city issue
for what seems like forever.Having lived here all of my life, “can youspare some change” rhetorically embedded inmy head for so many years,I have discovered there’s no simple solutionfor homelessness. You do what you can to temporarily allevi-ate the problem, whether it’s opening shelters,housing for the homeless, or serving a meal tothose who want it.
I’ve been involved in all three for many, many
years and it creates the nemesis of burnout,because I thought I could “x” the problem . . .
it didn’t happen, because along with the popula-
tion of the city growing, so too did the existingproblem.People arrive here because of the west coast
climate, they end up staying, thus creating a big-ger “homelessness” population. There are some
who make their best effort to move forward in
life, creating positive change for themselves and
the world around them.Then there are those who are among thedisadvantaged, possibly because of their own
upbringing, and escape to the island fearful. One
does not choose to be disadvantaged; it resultsfrom many forms of abuse.In the end, many valuable lessons can be
learned, and hopefully a harmonious community
can be created within the city. To shatter the old“us versus them” adage, any one of “us” couldbe “them.”The most valuable lesson we can all takefrom this is to treat everyone with the dignity and respect they deserve.
nicoLe BorthwicK
cAmoSun StuDent
L e t t e r s
Next publication date: Nov. 26, 2008Deadline: noon Nov. 19, 2008
Address:3100FoulBayRd.,Victoria,BC,V8P5J2Location:LansdowneRichmondHouse201Phone:250-370-3591Email:nexus@nexusnewspaper.comWebsite:www.nexusnewspaper.comPublisher:NexusPublishingSociety
NEXUS PUBLISHING SOCIEY
DBDB
KylaernsKellyarionizcrthurndreaoirJasonotzhrisaliriamutters
GGD
Jasonchreurs
YD
ailaBrown
DD
essaogman
YD
lanifer
D
Kaitavers
GuylaimoBrendanKerginizcrthur
G
ourtneyBroughton
DG
BreannaareyJasonchreurs250-370-3593ampuslus1-800-265-5372
DB
ourtneyBroughtonshleyoore
B:
GuylaimoJefBaldryliviaBertranddrianBinakajllieBowmanourtneyBroughtonhrisBurnettBreannaareyDanielarranzaKaitaverslishaharmleyessaogmanamanthaDoneyaelinadeGrassehristopherGillespieJaredGowenBrendanKerginDonaldKennedyKeltiearterKellyarionizcrthurJasonotzhantelleusselllaniferhanecott-ravisJennaedmakheamilowskiathantamdumJoelitheringtonamdenright
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors,not of the Nexus Publishing Society. One copy of Nexusis available per issue, per person. Nexus is printed ona mixture of 100 and 40 percent recycled paper. Pleaserecycle your copy. Thanks!
Editorial meetings
Come out to our weekly Nexus editorial meetings, whereall Camosun students can get involved in their studentnewspaper. Meetings take place every Tuesday at 11:30am in the Nexus ofce, Richmond House 201, Lansdowne.Call 370-3591 or e-mail nexus@nexusnewspaper.com formore information.
Send a letter
Nexus prints letters that are 250 words or less in responseto previous stories. Nexus reserves the right to refusepublication of letters. Letters must include full name andstudent number (not printed). Nexus accepts all lettersby e-mail to nexus@nexusnewspaper.com
VIEWS
Open Space accepts submissions from Camosun students. Submissions to Open Space should be400 words or less. Responses to previous articles in Nexus should be 250 words or less.E-mail submissions to nexus@nexusnewspaper.com and include your name and student number.
Open Space
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
In Oct. 15’s editorial, Forget to opt out? Too bad!, theamount of vision coverage for the student health anddental plan was listed at $80 every two years when, infact, it’s $100. Also, students don’t need to bring theirbenets card to access coverage at a pharmacy or den-tal ofce, as long as they know their policy number.
N e x u s E d i t o r i a l
The 2010 Olympic evictions
adrian BinaKaj
Contributing Writer
For the past couple monthsI’ve been looking for a suitableplace to live.
My primary source has become
UVic’s off-campus housing page,
advertising by far the cheapest and
most locally available suites forUVic and Camosun students.Usually, the rental listings I
lter through would be places with
ridiculously high rent. But every once in a while, I’d stumble overan ad that looked perfect.But then I’d get to the end of the ad, where a final note would
say “female only.” I’d think, “Okay,
maybe the room available is pink,”which has happened to me before.Maybe, at worst, the landlord wassimply sexist. I didn’t dwell on itand kept looking.More and more, I came acrossthis “female only” requirement,with more info added to it, like“mature female cat lover only.” It
became harder and harder to ignore.
Eventually, after counting howmany females-only ads there were,I decided to investigate.The Residential Tenancy Act
states landlords can’t discriminateagainst the tenant’s gender, unless
“the owner of the accommodationwill share a bathroom or kitchenwith the tenant.”
Having heard stories about maletenants and their kitchens from hell,
I was inclined to agree with thestereotype, but, on the other hand,the grossest bathrooms I’ve everseen denitely belong to girls.But it is understandable why some people would be hesitant torent to men. And the fact remains,it’s very hard to nd a place if youare a guy.I have found success at one
place, however. A Craigslist search
found no mentions of male or fe-male preference anywhere in ads
involving rentals. This is where I’ve
found accommodation in the past.
So, to my fellow male students look-
ing to rent and nding doors are
shut on your gender, don’t get a sex
change just yet—search Craigslistfor a welcome, affordable home.
Victoria’s gender-biased rental options
Maybe, at worst, thelandlord was simplysexist.
tessa coGman
Staff Writer
Into conspiracy
theories? Well, here’s
a local conspiracy theory for you.Many people have been leftcurious as to why, after years of debating, there’s been a ruling on
a tenting bylaw so close to the 2010
Olympic games.This judgment, which allowspeople to camp in public places in Victoria, demonstrates how many homeless people there are after
years of cuts to social programming
and housing programs.But why now?
More than 800 people have lost
their homes in the downtown east-side of Vancouver since the 2010Olympics were announced. TheOlympic forced evictions include
cheap hotels closing down to makeway for overpriced condos that even
a full-time worker can’t afford.The Vancouver homeless have
nowhere to go, and many are giving
Victoria a try because of the newtenting bylaw.Seems quite convenient that
Victoria is being so accommodating
to the homeless right around the
Olympics, doesn’t it? It’s almost as
if the homeless are schools of shbeing attracted by Victoria bait.There are 10,000 homelesspeople in BC, 2,000 in Vancouver,and 1,500 in Victoria. In 2005, Vic-toria only had 700 without homes.Three years later, it has doubled. When 2010 hits, the entireworld should know our govern-
ment has chosen the Olympics over
helping the homeless.
The $4.5 billion used to host the
Olympics could have made almost2,800 housing units for the poor.The government keeps tellingeveryone they don’t have the nan-
cing to get rid of the homeless crisis,but a new Skytrain line is being built
to the Vancouver International Air-port, the Squamish Highway is in
the works, and condos are shooting
up everywhere.
Although the government might
not be doing a whole lot to help thehomeless, there’s some hope forthe future.The Victoria Cool Aid Society,with funding from the province’sBC Housing and land suppliedby the City of Victoria, is propos-ing to construct a new emergency
shelter with transitional housing in
Burnside/Gorge.The new facility will betterhouse and support clients thatcurrently stay at the much smallerStreetlink shelter, plus create the
region’s rst shelter units for home-
less families.The scary thing is if at least50 percent of your income goestowards rent, you have a very highchance of being without a homeyourself.The Olympics should bring ex-citement to our province, but untilmore shelters are built, prepare to
see anti-Olympic groups rallying on
the streets, a large amount of tents
in public parks around Victoria, and
Olympic ticket holders pretendingto see none of it.
If the homeless had an Olympic
category, maybe someone wouldnotice.
More than 800 peoplehave lost their homesin the downtowneastside of Vancouversince the 2010Olympics wereannounced.
Leave a Comment