KingCast.net

This evening's email to Defendant Ayotte: Dear Attorney Ayotte: Have a nice day. You and I are just getting started on our Journey. Very truly yours, Christopher King, J.D. PS: I included a copy of Grafton County DA Hilaire's 4 page letter to me establishing the FACT that Attorney Troy Watts did indeed issue an Ethics Complaint against your boy blunder, Bruce McKay. Wonder what happened to the Franconia dummy file on that. Oh, wait: They played the people of Franconia and New Hampshire like dummies, yah.

Not a ton of reads. That's okay. I just need Judge Vaughn to read it as well as he understood the oral argument and the case in general. I won most of what I really needed and there is much, much more to come.

This has been superseded because it's so damn difficult to figure out how Gregory W. Floyd got Liko's live round in his pocket, among other things. http://www.scribd.com/doc/2613008/268-Bad-Faith Peace.

What an appropriate document for the last day of March, as it caps a Month of March Madness that witnessed Defendants Ayotte and Franconia Found liable for violating the Law in KingCast v. Ayotte et al., Grafton 07-E-268. And then we find a case almost squarely on point in this case. There is a higher power or force at work in this movement, totally. I think in the book "Opening Day" about Jackie Robinson there is a quote, "Luck is the residue of proper planning." Interesting, that.

I listened, and I heard Rich McLeod I believe say "I need professional advice about Intellectual property before we can proceed with this issue..... I don't have any information about Intellectual property..." Okay then Rich I'm here to help. : In addition to the law cited above let me break it down further into logo infringement because Franconia is indeed like a "brand." Hard Rock Cafe Licensing Corp. v. Pacific Graphics, Inc., 776 F. Supp. 1454 (1991). OVERVIEW: A heat transfer design company was enjoined from producing a transfer that was confusingly similar to a trademark owner's restaurant logo because the owner was likely to succeed on the merits in its trademark infringement and trade dress action. Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. Grottanelli, 164 F.3d 806 (1999) OUTCOME: The court affirmed the lower court's judgment to the extent it enjoined defendant repair shop's use of plaintiff motorcycle company's logo. The court reversed and remanded to the extent that the lower court enjoined defendant from certain uses of the word "hog," as that was a generic term not entitled to trademark protection. Now as I note below I can no longer view the Floyd T...

Clearly a case of Intellectual property theft as the Town has not granted any license for the use of its intellectual property/brand/copyright. ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC. v. DOES 1-9 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23560 (U.S. SDNY 2004), Laface Records, LLC v. Does 1-5, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72225 (U.S. WDSD Michigan, Sept. 27 2007). And to honor a man with a rap sheet like this: http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2008/02/kingcast-reveals-real-rap-sheet-on.html Who is now the subject of a Right-to-Know inquiry to the U.S Attorney's Office? http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2008/03/kingcast-rsa-91-afoia-request-to-us.html That fact that the Town has not taken any legal action on this is reprehensible. The Town is in fact granting imprimatur to it by inaction.

Hey Anonymous on 31 Dec. Judge Vaughn vehemently disagreed with you on the most important item, para. 7 and ORDERED Defendant Ayotte to produce the video. Got any other dumb shit to write?

Hmmm.... 27 views by 9:38. Nothing stellar, but interesting because I bet half of those are from the government, and I haven't even issued my daily email yet. There is some major activity going on in these cases, and all the while the major press is conveniently ignoring all of it. Whatever, my soul is All Good. As to theirs, whatever.

There you go. Keep it nice and simple. Surely they would want the public to know everything. One thing I'm still wondering about is the Tye-band issue where the town's Intellectual Property was stolen by someone and appropriated to make Gregory W. Floyd a hero. Have you tried to find out why the town has not objected to that? Thanks.

Section II: II. The Town’s responses as seen at KS 11 and KS 15, inclusive, violated RSA 91-A. At KS 11 Franconia Administrative Assistant Sally Small wrote Petitioner on 3 July 2007 “The documents in Corporal McKay’s files are all personnel related and fall into the category of personnel records. Therefore, the records will not be disclosed to you because of the reasons I have just mentioned.” Ms. Small’s opinion was seconded by town counsel Dan Mullen, who wrote at KS 15, “It is my understanding that Chief Montminy informed you that the personnel records of Bruce McKay would not be provided as they are exempt from disclosure pursuant to RSA 91-A:5.” With all due respect, Petitioner submits that those responses, which fail to even provide for the possibility of a Vaughn index, are patently unlawful and stand in absolute violation of RSA 91-A because they constitute a blanket denial. That calls for the imposition of heavy sanctions: Imposition of heavy penalties for violating the Right-to-Know Law, codified at N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 91-A (1990), may be appropriate to ensure the broadest possible access to public records, and thus summary disclosure is one remedy avai...

The following paragraph has been added to the end of Section 1: Perhaps at this point Petitioner should remind the Court that counsel for both Defendants actually misrepresented to this Court and to the entire Free World that Petition had not filed a Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Ayotte’s Motion to Dismiss, which was denied. The Court heard all of the arguments and made a Decision accordingly. http://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2008/01/kingcast-says-nh-aag-james-kennedy-and.html …..See Attachment 5.