pshaw

Page_white_text 3 Documents

Group 43098 Viewers

Thumb_up 41 Likes

5xu532ayitaom-medium

Basic Info
Name: James
Age: 26
Gender: Male

Contact Info
Website: http://del.icio.us/jcc...

Personal Info
   
Lately I've been reading: I AM AMERICA (and so can you!)
   
Lately I've been writing: Papers for class
   

Friends

No friends yet

Recent Documents Rss
(See all 3 documents)

Pdf_16x16 9 Pages
The paper discussing seam carving.
  • Eye 5410 views
  • Comment 1 Comment
Pdf_16x16 77 Pages
It's an introduction to VIM with some good PHP tips at the end.
  • Eye 25070 views
  • Comment 4 Comments
Pdf_16x16 17 Pages
MATLAB commands in numerical Python (NumPy) Vidar Bronken Gundersen /37mm.no 1 MATLAB commands in numerical Python (NumPy) Copyright c  Vidar Bronken Gundersen Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document as long as the above attribution is kept and the resulting work is distributed under a license identical to this one. The idea of this document (and the correspo...
  • Eye 12616 views
  • Comment 0 Comments

See all 3 documents


Collections

No collections

Comments

Comment on Chicken chicken chicken
Posted on May 18, 2008
Could I get the LaTeX file for this?
Comment on Does the Bible Have Contradictions?
Posted on October 4, 2007
Corrections: "All four of them were apostles." Luke was not an apostle. He mentions in the first four versus of his book that this is a collection of accounts. He never traveled with Jesus. "They all recorded the most important events, such as the last supper, the crucifixion of Jesus, and the resurrection of Jesus." Note: Mark never recorded the resurrection of Jesus. That account was added late by someone other than Mark. In the answer to #26, you claim that Luke gives the genealogy through Mary. The versus of Luke clearly state that the chain is composed of fathers and sons. Mary is never mentioned. To claim that this is the genealogy of Mary simply because Hebrew genealogies did not mention women is without any historical support. Matthew's genealogy mentions several women, and his book was intended to be read by Jewish people. This is a glaring, forever unresolved contradition of the Bible. One (or both) genealogies must be wrong. Same goes with your answer for #27, #28, and #29. In #30, the Hewbrew people have a word for "son", so they used it. Do not try to change the meaning of a word so you can maintain your delusion that the Bible is w...
Comment on Is The Bible True?
Posted on March 7, 2007
Please do yourself a favor and pick up a copy "Misquoting Jesus" by Bart D. Ehrman to find out how much of a human book the Bible is.