mers with thermoresponsive and zwitterionic properties.
29,30,32
These block copolymers were found to exhibit double ther-mosensitive phase transition of LCST and UCST behaviors inwater. However, these studies did not extend to the use orevaluation of these copolymers as biological or biomedicalmaterials. An early work reported the biocompatible nature of SBMA-based statistical copolymer coatings as potential anti-bioadherent surface coatings.
35
In this work, an interestingcombination of the zwitterionic polySBMA and nonionicthermoresponsive polyNIPAAm was studied as an example of intelligent biocompatible polymers, especially for their human-blood-contacting properties. The effect of copolymer concentra-tions, solvent polarities, and ionic strengths on the LCST andUCST of poly(SBMA-
co
-NIPAAm) in aqueous solution withdifferent monomer ratios of SBMA and NIPAAm are discussedin detail. This study also demonstrates the adsorption of plasmaproteins on the surface coated with poly(SBMA-
co
-NIPAAm)from human blood plasma via surface plasmon resonance (SPR),and the anticoagulant activity of the copolymers in a platelet-poor plasma solution by recalcified plasma clotting tests. Thiswork is aimed at addressing two important issues of poly(SBMA-
co
-NIPAAm), that is, (i) systematic measurement of the LCSTor UCST characteristics from various copolymer compositionsat different copolymer concentrations, solvent polarities, andionic strengths and (ii) in vitro evaluation of blood compatibilityof the fully coated copolymer surface and copolymer suspensionusing human plasma solution.
Materials and Methods
Materials.
[2-(Methacryloyloxy)ethyl]dimethyl(3-sulfopropyl)-am-monium hydroxide (sulfobetaine methacrylate, SBMA) macromonomerwas purchased from Monomer-Polymer and Dajac Laboratories, Inc.,U.S.A.
N
-Isopropylacrylamide (NIPAAm) from Sigma-Aldrich wasrecrystallized with hexane. Ammonium persulfate (APS),
N
,
N
,
N
′
,
N
′
-tetraethylmethylenediamine (TEMED), copper(I) bromide (99.999%),2-bromoisobutyryl bromide (BIBB, 98%), pyridine (98%), 2-hydroxy-ethyl acrylate (97%), 2,2-bipyridine (BPY, 99%), triethylamine (99%),tetrahydrofuran (THF HPLC grade), and ethanol (absolute 200 proof)were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 1-Undecanethiol (99
+
%), (1-mercapto-11-undecyl)tetra(ethylene glycol) (99
+
%), and 11-mercapto-1-undecanol (99
+
%) were purchased from Asemblon INC in Redmond,Washington, U.S.A. Fibrinogen (fraction I from human plasma),
γ
-globulin (fractions II, III, 99%), and human serum albumin (HSA,96
-
99%) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. Acetone andmethanol were of analytical grade, purchased from Sigma ChemicalCo. Deionized water (DI water) used in experiments was purified usinga Millipore water purification system with a minimum resistivity of 18.0 M
Ω
·
m. THF for reactions and washings was dried by sodiumbefore use.
ω
-mercaptoundecyl bromoisobutyrate was synthesizedthrough a reaction of BIBB using a method published previously byour group.
4,10
1
H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl
3
): 4.15 (t,
J
)
6.9, 2H, OCH
2
),2.51 (q,
J
)
7.5, 2H, SCH
2
), 1.92 (s, 6H, CH
3
), 1.57
-
1.72 (m, 4H,CH
2
), and 1.24
-
1.40 (m, 16H, CH
2
).
Preparation of Poly(SBMA-
co
-NIPAAm) in Aqueous Solu-tion.
A total solid content of 8 wt % for different mass ratios of SBMAand NIPAAm (Table 1) was dissolved in 10.2 mL of DI water, andnitrogen was bubbled through to remove residual oxygen. Thecopolymerization of poly(SBMA-
co
-NIPAAm) was initiated using 8.0mg of APS and 8.0 mg (0.011 mL) of TEMED. The relative molarratio of [APS]/[TEMED] was 1:2. The reaction was stirred underpositive nitrogen pressure for 6 h at 23
°
C. After polymerization, theresulting reaction solution was cooled to 4
°
C for 3 h and then addedslowly into acetone and redissolved into DI water repeatedly toprecipitate the polymer out of the reaction solution and to removeresidual chemicals. Finally, the copolymer was dried in a vacuum ovenat room temperature (23
°
C) to yield a white powder.
Preparation of Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold Sur-faces.
Two self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) were formed on thesubstrates: (1) methyl-terminated (CH
3
) and (2) initiator
ω
-mercap-toundecyl bromoisobutyrate (Br) SAMs. Glass chips were first coatedwith an adhesion-promoting chromium layer (thickness 2 nm) and asurface plasmon active gold layer (48 nm) by electron beam evaporationunder vacuum. Before SAM preparation, the gold-coated glass substratewas cleaned by washing with pure ethanol and DI water in sequence,dried with N
2
, then left in a UV light cleaner for 20 min at a sourcepower of 110 W, followed by rinsing with DI water and ethanol, andfinally dried again by N
2
. For preparation of CH
3
-
SAMs, the cleanedchip was soaked in a 2 mM ethanol solution of 1-undecanethiol or(1-mercapto-11-undecyl) and tetra(ethylene glycol) thiols for 24 h toform SAMs on the gold surface, and the chip was rinsed in sequencewith ethanol and water and then dried in a stream of N
2
. For thepreparation of an initiator SAM on a gold surface, the cleaned chipwas soaked in a 2 mM ethanol solution of
ω
-mercaptoundecylbromoisobutyrate for 24 h to form Br-SAMs on the gold surface andthen rinsed with pure ethanol followed by THF and dried in a streamof N
2
.
4,10
Preparation of SBMA and NIPAAm Polymer Brushes onGold Surfaces.
Dense polymer brushes of polySBMA and polyNIPAAmon an SPR sensor chip were achieved via the surface-initiated ATRPmethod, which were prepared by the following method, as reportedpreviously.
4,10,36
Polymer brushes were polymerized on gold substrateswith immobilized initiators of Br-SAMs based on our previousreports.
4,10
The reaction solutions of CuBr and BPY were first placedinto a sealed glass reactor in a drybox under nitrogen atmosphere. 200mM of degassed solution (pure water and methanol at a 1:3 volumeratio) with SBMA or NIPAAm monomers was transferred to the reactor,and the gold surface with immobilized initiators was then placed intothe reactor under nitrogen. After polymerization, the substrate wasremoved and rinsed with ethanol and water, and the samples were keptin water overnight. The prepared substrates were usually rinsed withPBS buffer to remove unbound polymers before any experiments. Thethickness of the substrates was measured by ellipsometry. The thickness
Table 1.
Characteristic Data of Poly(SBMA-
co
-NIPAAm) Statistical Copolymersreaction ratios ofcomonomers
a
(wt %)compositions ofcopolymers
b
(mol %)characterization ofcopolymers
c
(g/mol)critical solutiontemperature
d
(
°
C)sample ID SBMA NIPAAm polySBMA polyNIPAAm
M
w
M
w
/
M
n
UCST LCSTS100-N0 100 0 100.0 0.0 6336 3.6 27S70-N30 70 30 45.3 54.7 5818 3.4 18S50-N50 50 50 29.0 71.0 6262 3.5 15 41S30-N70 30 70 15.0 85.0 6649 3.5 37S0-N100 0 100 0.0 100.0 6951 3.5 32
a
Reaction mass ratios of SBMA and NIPAAm monomers used with fixed total monomer mass amount of 0.8 g in the prepared reaction solution.
b
Thecomposition of the poly(SBMA-
co
-NIPAAm) copolymers was estimated by
1
H NMR in D
2
O from the relative peak area of (CH
3
)
2
N
+
proton resonance ofthe polySBMA side groups at
δ
)
3.2 ppm and that of the methyl proton resonance of the polyNIPAAm isopropyl groups at
δ
)
1.14 ppm.
c
Weight-averagemolecular weights (
M
w
) and molecular weight distributions (
M
w
/
M
n
) were estimated by GPC and calibrated with PEO.
d
UCST and LCST were determinedby reading the absorbance at 230 nm on a UV
-
visible spectrophotometer.
B
Biomacromolecules, Vol. xxx, No. xx, XXXX
Chang et al.
D o w n l o a d e d b y T A I W A N C O N S O R T I A o n J u l y 2 6 , 2 0 0 9 P u b l i s h e d o n J u l y 2 , 2 0 0 9 o n h t t p : / / p u b s . a c s . o r g | d o i : 1 0 . 1 0 2 1 / b m 9 0 0 2 0 8 u
Leave a Comment