Copyright:
Attribution Non-commercial
The "Secret Committee" at Power Corp.
This document is an excerpt of the chapter entitled "The Spiral of Furor" in the...
(More)
The "Secret Committee" at Power Corp.
This document is an excerpt of the chapter entitled "The Spiral of Furor" in the book by Quebec author Jean-François Lisée called Dans L'Oeil de l'Aigle (In the Eye of the Eagle).
The "Secret Committee" at Power Corp. chapter documents covert activities directed by Power Corporation using elected Members of Parliament and others to radicalize the Quebec separatist movement, and to create a so-called "separatist" party which Trudeau would later be seen to "fight" in order to "save" Canada.
As my independent research has disclosed, that was indeed to be a phony separatist party, for the real goal of the Parti Québécois was not Quebec independence but to use Quebec separatism as a pretext to impose the legal and political system of the European Union (then the EEC) on Canada to replace Confederation.
There was and is no power under Section 91 for the federal Executive to replace Confederation by another system. Any attempt to do so would be a coup d’état and treason.
Moreover, there was and still is no power under Section 92 of the British North America Act, 1867 (now called the Constitution Act, 1867) for a provincial government to enact laws or take any measures with extra-territorial effect, and the power to secede being not only radically extra-territorial and specifically excluded at the time of Confederation to ensure Confederation would be a permanent union, there was never any constitutional power for René Lévesque or Trudeau to pursue secession by any means, including the 1980 referendum. The 1995 referendum was equally ultra vires (without power), thus void as an act of “government“. It was, however, the act of an incipient coup manipulated by Power Corporation and its network of multinationals who for decades have been trying to take down Canada to replace this country with the EU system, the basis of a world federation under a one-world corporate government.
It should be noted that Prime Minister Trudeau of Power Corporation’s secret committee is the one who pushed the referendum; he publicly “challenged“ Lévesque to hold it. Trudeau himself tabled the first draft bill in Canadian parliament to institute a referendum on “national unity“.
As there is no power for the Executive to destroy the Constitution under which they are elected, this was treason on the part of Trudeau.
Trudeau’s intergovernmental affairs minister of the day, Marc Lalonde, announced the draft bill through the general media, but concluded that the referendum would likely be held only in Quebec, as indeed it was.
Trudeau’s draft bill was never enacted, which cleverly evaded the risk of judicial review for vires (i.e., for a source of power, or authority under the Constitution). Instead, the referendum was handed to Lévesque by Trudeau, with Trudeau leading the preparations from the Prime Minister’s Office.
The 1980 referendum, like the next in 1995, was void for want of vires, i.e. it could not be held because there was no power, i.e., no subject-matter jurisdiction under Section 92 and as well, secession would be radically extra-territorial. Replacing Confederation with the EEC system would be radically extraterritorial if you were to push the analogy to its limit; however, at this point, you are so far outside the lawful Constitution that what we have here is not merely void action of an otherwise lawful government, but a very clever attempt at a coup d’état by an incipient coup manipulating the Constitution.
The referendum of 1980 proceeded because Trudeau and Marc Lalonde cleverly “media-legalized“ it, using Canada’s press and broadcast outlets to stage a fake “battle“ to “save“ Canada. A naive Canadian electorate were the victims of a supreme con: they were tricked by Trudeau and the secret committee of Power Corporation into believing that Canada could be “lost“ in a referendum.
Kathleen Moore, author of HABEAS CORPUS CANADA, The Official Legal Challenge To
(Less)
Add a Comment