1.
Whether a court can, at the request of alitigant, initiate and conduct civil contemptproceedings in a manner inconsistent with theConstitution and statutory protections of law usingamorphous standards to
indefinitely
imprison adebtor (here for over six years) and fine himapproximately $30,000,000, without charging himwith a crime and trying him before a jury and withoutguidance from this Court as to the rights due him.2.
Whether an indeterminate fine of approximately $30,000,000 imposed on individualbankruptcy debtor, without identification of the payeeparty, and without ability to pay and imprisonmentfor over six years, is a criminal contempt sanction in
light of International Union, UAW v. Bagwell
, 512U.S. 821 (1994)3.
Whether the use of civil contempt
―equity‖ powers
and secret proceedings in bankruptcycourt against a debtor, concerning turnover of assetstransferred six years prior to a bankruptcy filing,violates the Fifth Amendment
’s
due process clauseand privilege against self-incrimination, and theSixth Amendment where (1) the debtor had beensecretly referred
to the U.S. Attorney’s Office
forprosecution; (2) no immunity was granted
; (3) the ―actof production‖ constitutes an admission to hiding
estate assets, a bankruptcy crime; and (4)
the debtor
’
sself-incrimination claims, all other claims, and fineswere ruled to be unreviewable
.
Add a Comment