Q-medium
0 Documents
0 Subscribers
0 Reads
F0e9fa35ab
Stacked_icons_15x15
unclemashem Scribbled:
Pfff What a waist of time as it is was impossible for the high courts to have been lawfully created by a parliament which was is not in subjucation to the constitution. (a constitutional requirement)Further to that the high courts came into being 10 days after the dissalution of an unelected parliament. Further to that, regarding the nessary seperation of powers that would have made Barton and O"Connor both PM and high court judges at the same same time snd worse still self appointed.The position of PM is all the proof one needs to show that The Australian parliament has never been lawful.Another interesting fact is that Barton blackmailed the Govenor general for the commissioning of the position of PM by threatening to keep victoria out of the commonwealth if he was not appointed PM. Leading to the decommisioning of Lyne, his first selection for the unconstitutional position of Prime minister.The word treason comes to mind.
06 / 25 / 2009
F0e9fa35ab
Stacked_icons_15x15
unclemashem Scribbled:
You miss the fact that the Australian parliament has never been subjucation to the Australian constitution act vict 1900.The easiest proof is in the position of PM wich does not exist in the constitution.Hence no laws passed by the unconstitutional parliament are lawfull.And that is in accordance with the constitution itself.
06 / 25 / 2009