• Embed Doc
  • Readcast
  • Collections
  • CommentGo Back
 
Article I.Why So Many Kids Go Wrong
 Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal. - Albert Camus,French writer (1913-1960)Well, I do, Albert, so where are you so I can refute your statement?Seriously,Camus was right, some people do go to extensive lengths to be considered normal by others. Butwhy?We are social animals. As such we have standards, mores and rules/laws by which people mustconduct their affairs so that our society does not descend into chaos. When we deal with a clerk in astore, for example, we have an idea of what to expect from that person, as the clerk does for us.Two or three decades ago (depending on the location) a movement began to make people in wheelchairs haveaccess to every building they may need to enter. That made sense for a medical building, for example, because someone in a wheelchair would certainly need to visit a doctor eventually.People in wheelchairswanted to be treated like everyone else and have access everywhere someone with two working legswould have. To them, normal meant having the same rights or access as those who could walk.Strivingto be normal goes much deeper than that. A child who is socially underdeveloped may work very hard to be like the rest of the kids, but that child can never be "normal" in a social setting. The child may seemto be a loner, may stutter, may remain quiet with others around, may agree with the leader of the groupmost often, will likely not do well with schoolwork, but try as he or she might they will not be able to belike the others, normal in a social setting.Being socially underdeveloped as a child carries throughadulthood, sometimes through life itself. Many socially underdeveloped kids eventually learn the socialskills their peers did as children, whereupon they can interact in social settings like others, thus be"normal." That catching up socially requires a huge amount of effort, something Camus says that fewunderstand.Certainly the peers of a socially underdeveloped child don't understand. They consider thekid weird or strange. They nitpick to find faults with the child that may not exist in reality so they cantalk about the odd one in their own "normal" groups.Often a socially underdeveloped child will be bullied by another socially underdeveloped child. Bullies are classic cases of social underdevelopment, perhaps with a touch of maldevelopment. They need social interaction with peers, but have no idea howto achieve it. They want to be normal, but can't, so they lash out at the weakest among them, which isusually another socially underdeveloped child. The same happens with adult bullies and their victims.Children who are underdeveloped emotionally have similar adjustment problems. They tend to be punished for their deficiencies and the resulting behaviours, as socially underdeveloped children areas well. What we don't understand in odd or strange children usually causes them to violate socialnorms, thus we punish them to teach them how to act normally.Yes, we punish children and adults for  being socially and/or emotionally underdeveloped and acting out because they can't cope with their inability to be normal with their peers.By punishing them as children we ensure that they will not likelyrise to the level of development of their peers because they will believe that it's impossible for them to be normal. They will always feel left out, different.Almost every adult in a prison is either socially or emotionally underdeveloped or maldeveloped, or both. At that age they have been broken for so longthat society could not afford to do the necessary psychological repairs, so we put them behind bars andforget about them. Pretend they don't exist in our society. Call them bad, social offenders.It may be truethat most children are born with the same potential. That potential is very different among them by theage they enter the school system because of their different opportunities (or lack thereof) to developsocially and emotionally as well as they do physically and intellectually in the intervening fewyears.Trouble begins in the school system. Teachers are not only not granted permission to work todevelop children's social and emotional skills according to the curriculum, they may be denied permission (in most classroom settings) by the administration. "There isn't time." "Stick to thecurriculum." By the time kids enter school, many parents believe they have taken their children as far asthey need to socially and emotionally, so they leave it up to the school to carry on. The school can't domuch in most cases.Every socially or emotionally inappropriate behaviour of adults can be traced back to social or emotional (or both) deficits when they were children. No one wants to do this and few willtry because it upsets everyone who prefers to deny any responsibility for underdevelopment or maldevelopment of social miscreant adults, when they were children. Society can manage social and1
 
emotional development of children the same way it manages intellectual and physical development. Infact, plans to do this are fairly easy and very cheap to implement.Before anything can be changed, wemust admit as a society that we have children who are not receiving assistance with their social andemotional development. Then we can put programs in place to train parents and teachers how to fulfillthe rest of their respective roles in raising a child.Talk about it.Bill Allin is a sociologist, retired teacher and author of the book Turning It Around: Causes and Cures for Today's Epidemic Social Problems, as well as the fountain of inspiration for programs related to the TIA program.Learn more athttp://billallin.com
Article II.The Secret Of Love
Animals have these advantages over man: they never hear theclock strike, they die without any idea of death, they have notheologians to instruct them, their last moments are not disturbedby unwelcome and unpleasant ceremonies, their funerals costthem nothing, and no one starts lawsuits over their wills.- François Marie Arouet (aka Voltaire), letter to Count Schomberg, August1769As admirable as Voltaire's reasoning ability was and as impressive hisobservations about human nature, I wonder how he reached the conclusionthat animals know nothing of the power of life.An avowed dog person for most of my life, I became servant to a householdcat some 18 years ago. Since then my wife and I have had two other cats,one of which has epilepsy and has gone deaf. The most impressive--dare I say shocking--lesson I have learned in my yearsof observing the behaviour of cats is that they are remarkably similar tohumans in their needs. I don't mean just the needs for food, shelter andsecurity, which all living things share.Our cats do hear our grandmother clock strike because it gongs on the hourand half-hour. It means nothing to them because neither the ticking of theclock nor the gong itself serve any purpose toward satisfying their needs.What does a clock add to our lives? At most it serves as a reminder that wemust perform actions, usually in the service of others. Cats can be altruisticat times, but they are clearly not into servitude. Cats would havedisappointed Pavlov.Our cats know when they want to be fed because they are hungry. If theyaren't hungry, they don't care if food is available to them or not. They don'tovereat, nor do they eat in front of the television. They will, however, eat asa form of comfort, if their problem is not of a severely emotional nature. They clearly know when they need to be touched (petted). Not only do theymake their needs known to the petters, they allow little to stand in the wayof their satisfying that need when they have it, if humans are around. Theyprefer petting from the humans they know, but will accept it from strangerswho happen around at the right time.Humans do not do that. We seldom know when we need to be touched byanother, even though it's a need so fundamental to us that regular lack of touch can alter our personality.Children almost never come to mommy demanding to be held. They maycome, but they don't ask in words. The closest they come to asking is when
2
 
they hurt themselves. Being held by mommy when they hurt does nothing tohelp the hurt, it's a way of (an excuse for) demanding to be touched withoutusing words (we don't use words to express that need, sad to say).Voltaire says that animals have no idea of death. I disagree. When ourepileptic cat has a petit or grand mal seizure, he wants to be alone in anenclosed area, secure that he won't explode all over the place. However, fordays before and after the seizure, he seeks touch and comfort many timeseach day. He knows when he will have a seizure, days ahead. He seeks thesecurity he wants and needs ahead of time.People seldom know they are about to have an epileptic seizure until ithappens, or maybe just a brief period before. Cats are more sensitive to theirbodies. Most of the time they do what they must to heal themselves. Onlytheir owners insist upon taking them to vets.For months before our oldest cat died, she came to me many times eachday, to sit on my lap or to cuddle in the crook of my arm as I lied in bednapping. This was uncharacteristic behaviour for that cat, though it isn't forthe epileptic one now. I don't doubt that they would know when the end of their life is near. Maybe they don't dream of heaven, but who knows?Voltaire's reference to the clock striking, of course, refers to the death knell,not to the regular striking of a gong or ticking of the pendulum. His point isthat we make much of a charade of death, most of which serves no realpurpose but to make the grieving ones feel worse.My point differs from Voltaire's in that I want us to pay attention to thecharacteristics and needs of animals that we share with them, but that theydo better than us.We know that dogs and cats love to be petted. We call them pets for thatreason. They need touch and they demand it from those who can bestprovide it. To a dog or cat, brushing the fur is nothing more than another wayfor them to be touched.We need to recognize our own need for touch. Life without touch is not easyand life with a decreasing amount of touch from a loved one is even harderbecause we feel the lack of touch and our increase in need. The death of aspouse may be hardest on those who benefitted most from loving touch fromthe dead mate for many years.Hospitals (not all) and nursing homes have found the benefits of havingpeople with pets visit so that patients can touch them. Nurses stroke theirpatients and touch them more than ever in the past because it helps thepatients to feel better, even to heal faster in some cases.Voltaire's quotation was not about animals after all, but about satisfying ourown real needs instead of trying to play act unnecessary stuff while ignoringwhat is really important.Now, while you think about it, go give someone you love a hug. Do it severaltimes a day if you can. Don't miss a day.One of the mysteries of love is that we can't measure it. Think not? Most of us, without being aware of it, measure how much others love us by theamount of loving touch we receive from them.Remember, it's not just the amount of touch we receive from others that'simportant. It's just as important to those we love that we give loving touch tothem so that they can keep track of how much we love them. It works bothdays. We measure love by the amount of touch we receive, they measurelove by the amount they receive.
3
of 00

Leave a Comment

You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...
You must be to leave a comment.
Submit
Characters: ...