xtremepunker scribbled: The official figure for Auschwitz hasn't been reduced. It's been 1,1-1,5 million in the history books for 50 years. The soviet government exaggerated the number of russians that were killed in Auschwitz. They had been told by historians that this figure of 4 million dead was wrong but they refused to acknowledge this until the Soviet Union fell. The history books have always been correct about this. There are tons of evidence of the nazi genocide and the information isn't unreliable at all. What's completely unreliable is Holocaust denial since deniers have been caught lying too many times. Your antisemitic statement that there's a "jewish propensity for lying" shows where this denial really comes from.

xtremepunker scribbled: I told you where to find the documents you say you seek. If you don't want to be exposed to something that conflicts with your mindless drivel then quit demanding historical evidence. You don't want truth, you just comforting lies to justify your antisemitism like every denier.

xtremepunker scribbled: No, you are anti-semitic for saying that Hitler's hatred for the jews is logical and rational and that the jews control all media and politics. That's the working definition of anti-semitism for the European Union. Again, I won't do your research for you. Read a proper history book. Extensive research has already been done and historical truth has already been established. I'm sorry it doesn't fit your crazy ideology... wait, I'm not!

xtremepunker scribbled: The bombing of Dresden was not an act of genocide; it was not an attempt to exterminate the German people and this is quite obvious. The number of casualties was not bigger than the bombing of London by the nazis and even the denier David Irving agrees. The short-lived boycott of German goods by a few business owners because of nazi hatred towards jews is not an act of genocide either. Or would you call islamic boycott of Danish goods genocide? What's more, the nazis immediately retaliated with a boycott of jewish goods and jewish organizations soon agreed to end it in exchange for jewish lives. Forensic testing of the gas chambers done by the Institute for Forensic Research in Cracow indicated the presence of cyanide in greater quantities than the buildings which were fumigated a few times with Zyklon B. This shows the impossibility of the denier claim that the gas chambers were just morgues which were occasionally fumigated. I'm convinced they were gas chambers because of the nazi documents describing them as gas chambers and the testimony of both prisoners and SS personnel. There's no bias or conspiracy, history is the work of thousands of historians who have ideological differences and they have reached a consensus. As in science, the burden of proof lies on those who defy the accepted consensus. There's heaps of evidence backing this historical consensus and your unawareness of it is irrelevant. The burden of proof is on those who make outrageous claims which deny common knowledge. You have NOT done your research properly. I have reviewed the documents in question many times. I won't do your research for you. Google it or visit your local library. And please spare me the usual "inquisitive mind" strategy of deniers. Your comments on other documents show your anti-semitism as the real motive behind your assertions.

xtremepunker scribbled: As I said, evidence of the Holocaust is readily available at any library or even online. Not just the testimony of both the victims and perpetrators, but also the nazi documents (that even deniers accept as factual), photographs, forensic testing of the gas chambers (from reputable institutions, not ignorant deniers who don't know how to take samples) and recent excavations in the former camps which appeared in many newspapers. The bombing of Germany was a war crime, just as Germany's bombing of Britain and Guernica were war crimes. But that's where the comparison and moral relativism end. The Holocaust was an act of genocide and therefore a crime against humanity. There was no genocide against the Germans.

xtremepunker scribbled: No, Holcaust denial is absolutely divorced from science and reality. The scientific process involves conjecturing rational explanations and then contrasting them with the available evidence for corroboration. Only then a conclusion is reached as to whether the theory withstands the evidence or it's false. Holocaust deniers first reach a conclusion for ideological reasons and then manipulate and distort the historical evidence to fit that conclusion. Whatever evidence doesn't fit is discarded, labeled as a hoax and a great conspiracy involving millions of people. They have been exposed as pathological liars and some of these easily refuted lies are detailed in this book.

xtremepunker scribbled: Are you talking to me? There's tons of evidence of the Holocaust, including nazi documents and forensic evidence. Given tre overwhelming amount of evidence no rational scientist would ever such absurd questions. Deniers deny, they don't do science.