The New York Times

Dunkirk, the War and the Amnesia of the Empire

TWO AND A HALF MILLION INDIANS FOUGHT ALONGSIDE THE BRITISH IN WORLD WAR II BUT ARE LEFT OUT OF ACCOUNTS LIKE CHRISTOPHER NOLAN’S FILM ‘DUNKIRK.’

OXFORD, England — Two and a half million soldiers drawn from Britain’s empire in South Asia fought in World War II. But they are missing from many British commemorations and accounts of the war — an absence reinforced by Christopher Nolan’s new film “Dunkirk,” which does not feature any of the Indian soldiers who were present at the battle.

The Indian soldiers at Dunkirk

This article originally appeared in .

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The New York Times

The New York Times4 min read
Going Barefoot Isn't So Bad
Shoes protect our feet, but they also alter our strides and could increase the wear on our leg joints. Wearing shoes when we walk changes how our feet interact with the ground below us, according to a novel new study in the journal Nature of shod and
The New York Times7 min read
Audre Lorde's Berlin
Online job boards and gig-economy apps have made it easier than ever to find temporary and short-term work in places you want to go.
The New York Times4 min readPsychology
Why Has Language Changed So Much So Fast? 'Because Internet'
Toward the end of “Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language,” linguist Gretchen McCulloch acknowledges a paradox at the heart of her book. On the one hand, books about usage tend to enshrine language in a set of rules, and woe to any