The Atlantic

Trump's Recycled Afghanistan Policy

Campaign-trail rhetoric aside, his inability to define victory was the most troubling part of his speech.
Source: Joshua Roberts / Reuters

President Donald Trump’s speech on Afghanistan on Monday night wasn’t remarkable for it’s new ideas—there wasn’t much new to be found. There wasn’t, as administration officials had led many to expect, a new number for the U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan, or a new approach to Pakistan, or a new regional strategy for South Asia.

Instead, Trump’s speech was remarkable for what was old. It represented a return to themes of the campaign trail for a candidate who insisted that he could and would carry out foreign policy better than his predecessors—George W. Bush and Barack Obama, alike—without actually.

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The Atlantic

The Atlantic5 min readSociety
We Don’t Know What’s Behind the COVID-19 Racial Disparity. And That’s a Problem.
COVID-19 is killing black Americans with horrifying precision. Black Americans get the disease at a higher rate than white people do. Retirement homes with black residents become outbreak clusters. Black people die of COVID-19 at a higher rate than w
The Atlantic3 min readPolitics
Israel’s Choice, Between Shame and Pride
The opening of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption trial on Sunday was a moment of intense national shame and intense national pride. The shame is obvious: the serving prime minister taking his place on the defendant’s bench, charged with
The Atlantic7 min readPolitics
Estonia Already Lives Online—Why Can’t the United States?
Using secure identification, people there can bank, apply for government assistance, file for sick leave, order prescriptions, and get medical care—all online.