STAT

Cancer is ‘natural.’ The best treatments for it aren’t

It's easy to believe that something that is "all natural" is intrinsically good. That doesn't apply to cancer treatments.
Scanning electron micrograph of a three-day old cluster of breast cancer cells.

In the early years of my career as an oncologist, I’m learning that you really remember the patients you can’t save. Those with essentially curable cancers who refused the right treatment stand out the most.

One of those is a patient I’ll call Ruth. She was only 30 when she was diagnosed with breast cancer, as I learned later from her medical history. It was localized to her left breast and contained within the relatively small tumor; there were no signs it had spread to other parts of her body. With the right treatment, Ruth had about a 75 percent chance of

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from STAT

STAT4 min readSociety
Opinion: ICER’s Concern For Patients: Where’s The Beef?
ICER describes itself as the "nation's drug pricing watchdog." If it truly wants to be that, it needs to include the people who use health care in its assessments.
STAT4 min read
Opinion: Time In Range: A New Way For People With Diabetes To Monitor Blood Sugar
We've come a long way in the ability to measure blood sugar, from boiling urine with Benedict's solution to effort-free checks every few minutes with a continuous glucose monitor.
STAT3 min read
Not Only Who But What: NIH Funding Disparity Between Black And White Scientists Partly Driven By Research Topic
Not only who but what: NIH funding disparity between black and white scientists partly driven by research topic.