The Christian Science Monitor

'Grant' vigorously portrays its subject as a great military leader, champion of rights, honest man

The conventional wisdom about Ulysses S. Grant is that he was a first-rate general and a fourth-rate president. Indeed, historians and political scientists have traditionally labeled his two terms in office as a “failure” or close to it. But that legacy is being reassessed. 

In recent years, two historians – Jean Edward Smith and Ronald White – have authored well-received books which argued that Grant was, in fact, a great military leader and a better president than we realize. That argument has been vigorously and extensively expanded in , a magnificent book by distinguished biographer Ron Chernow. Indeed, after reading this deeply researched and superbly written volume, the reader will understand why Walt Whitman put Grant,

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The Christian Science Monitor

The Christian Science Monitor6 min read
Privacy, Accuracy, And The Looming 2020 Census
Census Bureau decision to adopt a more rigorous system to ensure privacy for survey participants has some concerned about the accuracy of data.
The Christian Science Monitor10 min read
Will Hawaii Lead The Renewable Revolution?
Hawaii has positioned itself as a pioneer in the quest to move toward a fossil fuel-free future. Its path may hold lessons for the rest of the U.S.
The Christian Science Monitor6 min read
Behind That Chicken Dinner, Immigrants With Little Workplace Voice
Poultry processing plants have increasingly relied on immigrant workers to fill jobs with low pay and significant safety risks.