The Guardian

Which works better: climate fear, or climate hope? Well, it's complicated

Communication is everything when it comes to the climate change debate – and there isn’t just one way to speak to people’s emotions
The Perito Moreno glacier in Los Glaciares national park, southern Argentina, breaks. ‘It seems the hope and fear camps of the climate debate are each seeing only part of the puzzle.’ Photograph: Ariel Molina/EPA

There’s a debate in climate circles about whether you should try to scare the living daylights out of people, or give them hope – think images of starving polar bears on melting ice caps on the one hand, and happy families on their bikes lined with flowers and solar-powered lights on the other.

The debate came to something of a head this year, after David Wallace-Wells lit up the internet with his 7,000-word, published in New York magazine. It went viral almost instantly, and soon was the best-read. But it also criticism and from more than the usual denier set.

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The Guardian

The Guardian4 min read
Is Drinking Coffee Safe During Your Pregnancy? Get Ready For Some Nuance | Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz
We live in the real world where pregnant people are people and shouldn’t be locked in a cage of guilt for nine months
The Guardian4 min readSelf-Improvement
If You Avoid Phone Calls, You're Missing Out. Here's Why | Melanie Tait
Culturally, we’re moving away from phone conversations – but they’re often the best part of my day
The Guardian3 min read
'The Most Important People Have Been Here': Rome's Oldest Cafe Fears Closure
Caffè Greco has welcomed patrons from Dickens to Diana – but a rent rise has put its future in doubt