The New York Times

Preventive Care Saves Money? Sorry, It's Too Good to Be True

The idea that spending more on preventive care will reduce overall health care spending is widely believed and often promoted as a reason to support reform. It’s thought that too many people with chronic illnesses wait until they are truly ill before seeking care, often in emergency rooms, where it costs more. It should follow then that treating diseases earlier, or screening for them before they become more serious, would wind up saving money in the long run.

Unfortunately, almost none of this is

This article originally appeared in .

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The New York Times

The New York Times6 min read
Here Lies the Skull of Pliny the Elder, Maybe
(Science Times) The Roman admiral and scholar died during the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 A.D. Might this really be his cranium?
The New York Times3 min read
What's the World's Worst Smell?
(Science Times) ; (Good Question) Some odors are more heinous than others. Then there’s Stench Soup.
The New York Times5 min read
Some Assisted-Living Residents Don't Get Promised Care, Suit Charges
(Science Times) ; (The New Old Age) The letter went out to about 1,900 Californians a few weeks ago from law firms bringing a class action suit against one of the country’s largest assisted-living chains. If the recipients, or their family members, h