This Week in Asia

Why is Beijing so obsessed with order? It fears the alternative

The Xi era is about achieving great historic goals. The mission to be a strong, powerful country is within reach.

And disobedience, however small, however seemingly insignificant, is treason to this great effort. It could disrupt things. It could set things back. So no matter what, every effort is being made to make sure that such aberrant events don't occur. I might not like the nervousness, but I do understand it. Never has so much been at stake for China.

With a world outside in increasing disarray and confusion, China's great moment is more real, and more imminent, than anyone ever expected. In what the French situationist Guy Debord called the "era of the spectacle", where everything is about how things look rather than how they actually are, the performance of national renaissance and rejuvenation in Beijing and across the country is the crucial thing. The script has been finalised. Everyone needs to know their part. Even the audience have been told when to applaud. There can be no ad-libbing in this great play.

Much has been written about what influence things like China's outward investments might be giving it, or its exports and the trade imbalances they've created with the US and others.

These are often accused of being instruments in some larger strategic push to promote Chinese interests. Some see these interests as positive, others as more ominous. The fact President Xi Jinping alluded to a "China Model" implicitly embodying these objectives that the outside world might want to use when addressing the Party Congress in Beijing last October has only intensified interest in what Beijing might be up to.

US President Donald Trump returns to Joint Base Andrews in Maryland. A potential US trade war with China continues to spook investors. Photo: Reuters

The official Chinese government retort to criticism about its seeking influence is that it is searching for win-win situations, parity and mutual respect. Plenty of others, however, see this model as very self-interested, exclusivist, and excluding, and often resulting in asymmetrical outcomes in Beijing's favour. They believe it wants things on its terms, to serve its own internal issues.

It might be a great power on the rise, their critique goes, but this unilateral, and self-centred approach, is still one that comes across in government statements, and the rigid adherence to observing non-intervention, even in issues like Syria and the use of chemical weapons there. China's multilateralism, like pretty much everything else it promotes, has "Chinese characteristics", which often makes it look like old-fashioned unilateralism dressed up.

If we want to understand where China is coming from, and why its power often seems "sharp", we might focus in particular on the concept of order adhered to by Beijing.

It sits at the heart of the Xi governance philosophy. It is the common principle throughout the post-1978 era, and something that comes through when one looks at the promotion of the Belt and Road Initiative, and of the nascent ideas of a China model. This all facilitates and promotes a specific notion of order and the need for stability.

Destruction at the recently recaptured Douma city, in Damascus, Syria. A fact-finding mission has entered the city to investigate claims about the use of chemical weapons. China maintains a non-interventionist policy on the matter. Photo: EPA

This is everywhere one looks when one observes China - from the demand to know what someone is going to say at a small public event outside the country, to the centralised, guiding role played by the state enterprises even abroad; the function of the United Front of the Communist Party and the work it does among Chinese students and others abroad.

A cargo ship owned by Yang Ming departs New York harbour. The US bought over US$500 billion in goods from China last year alone. Photo: AFP

Informed by Confucian and other classical ideas of humanity and nature, and of social hierarchy, it arises from very different philosophical roots to, for instance, ideas of political order in enlightenment thinkers like Kant or Hume. At best, it might be described as collectivist, utilitarian and pervaded by instrumentality. Defence of pluralism, individuality and minority interests don't make much of an appearance.

It is also profoundly informed by historic memories from Chinese imperial histories of turbulence, collapse, and implosion, going back two millennia.

No wonder Chinese leaders today place such a premium on order at any cost. But those outside engaging with this concept need to be clear - fear sits right beside it. It is an order predicated more on avoiding negative things happening, rather than outlining some bold, positive vision of how things can be different, and better.

This article originally appeared on the South China Morning Post (SCMP).

Copyright (c) 2018. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

More from This Week in Asia

This Week in Asia5 min read
Spurned By West, Saudi Crown Prince MBS Heads To China, Becomes Unlikely Peacemaker For India And Pakistan
Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman created quite the buzz this week with his whirlwind weeklong Asian tour, starting in Pakistan on Sunday before moving to India and wrapping it up with a two-day stop in China that ended on Friday. Many
This Week in Asia4 min readPolitics
Former New Zealand PM Jenny Shipley Distances Herself From Controversial Op-ed In Chinese State Media
Former New Zealand prime minister Jenny Shipley has distanced herself from a controversial op-ed published in China's People's Daily, saying the state-run newspaper constructed it from an interview she did during a visit to China last December. Publi
This Week in Asia3 min read
China Must Choose: Growth Or Lasting Economic Health. It Can't Have Both
It is an irony of the so-called free economies that their governments are more constrained than China's when it comes to pursuing growth. China's central bank can print as much money as the economy needs; its government can order state-owned banks to