The New York Times

It Saves Lives. It Can Save Money. So Why Aren't We Spending More on Public Health?

Not only have many public health interventions in the United States been hugely successful, but they’ve also saved more money than they’ve cost.

And yet Americans spend relatively little money in that domain and far more on medical care that returns less value for its costs. Instead of continually complaining about how much is being spent on health care with little to show for it, maybe we should direct more of that money to public health.

What Do We Mean by Public Health?

It encompasses efforts made to improve the health of a broad population with investments not ordinarily considered “health care.” For example, ad campaigns that encourage better health behaviors — like exercising or quitting smoking.

This article originally appeared in .

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The New York Times

The New York Times5 min read
The Health System We'd Have if Economists Ran Things
(The Upshot: The New Health Care) A survey of nearly 200 Ph.D. health economists finds them taking a few politically unpopular positions.
The New York Times4 min read
'Minor Feelings' Rescues Personal Experience From the Expectations of Others
(Books of The Times) In “Minor Feelings,” a collection of essays, poet Cathy Park Hong writes in ways both polemical and lyrical about her identity as an Asian-American woman.
The New York Times5 min read
Your Doorbell Camera Spied on You. Now What?
Has there ever been a tech product more polarizing than Ring? The internet-connected doorbell gadget, which lets you watch live video of your front porch through a phone app or website, has gained a reputation as the webcam that spies on you and that