The New York Times

A Jury May Have Sentenced a Man to Death Because He's Gay. And the Justices Don't Care.

THE SUPREME COURT ANNOUNCED IT WOULD NOT STOP SOUTH DAKOTA FROM KILLING A MAN BECAUSE HE IS GAY.

On June 18, the Supreme Court announced it would not stop South Dakota from killing a man who may have been sentenced to death because he is gay.

Some of the jurors who imposed the death penalty on Charles Rhines in 1993 have said they thought the

This article originally appeared in .

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The New York Times

The New York Times8 min readScience
Organoids Are Not Brains. How Are They Making Brain Waves?
Clusters of living brain cells are teaching scientists about diseases like autism. With a new finding, some experts wonder if these organoids may become too much like the real thing.
The New York Times2 min read
How to Do Better Than Merely Getting Ahead
Outracing the pack is overrated. But defining enough and then stopping there? It may be the best life shift you’ve made in ages.
The New York Times8 min read
CORRECTION: 36 Hours in Santa Barbara County
On a spectacular stretch of California coastline, vineyards, gorgeous beaches, markets and Mission-style architecture beckon.