The Christian Science Monitor

Supreme Court ruling has 'huge' implications for voting rights

In a decision split along ideological lines, the United States Supreme Court Monday overturned almost entirely a lower court ruling that had invalidated several political districts in Texas for harming the voting power of racial minorities.

These final weeks of the Supreme Court’s term have been defined by narrow technical rulings in contentious cases on issues such as partisan gerrymandering and religious liberty. Today’s decision on racial gerrymandering in Texas veers from that pattern, experts say. Less than two years away from a new round of redistricting, it could have significant implications for voting rights lawsuits.

“There was a lot of evidence of discriminatory intent in the [Texas] map that the [high] court sort of ignored,” says Michael Li, a senior counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School, “and today’s ruling shows a huge presumption of good faith even in

Lower court ‘critically flawed’‘What’s the use of Section 3?’States following suit?

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The Christian Science Monitor

The Christian Science Monitor7 min read
When Tornadoes Are Only The First Of Your Worries
The coronavirus has complicated Nashville’s tornado recovery, but residents are getting creative about how to help each other.
The Christian Science Monitor3 min readPolitics
How John McCain And A Cabin In The Woods Inspired An Environmentalist
Benji Backer marries two passions – conservative politics and the outdoors – in organizing other students to embrace conservation.
The Christian Science Monitor3 min readSociety
They Walked Free. Until A Reporter Knocked At Their Door.
Journalist Jerry Mitchell dug up evidence that helped reopen decades-old civil rights-era murder cases in the South, including that of Medgar Evers.