Opinion: Graduate biomedical education needs an overhaul. Here’s our version

We need new ways to provide a steady supply of creative, dedicated scientists. Our initiative offers a new model for doing that.
Graduate biomedical education hasn't changed all that much since the 1800s. It needs a reboot. Source: Hulton Archive/Getty Images

One of the great educational success stories is that graduate training can teach individuals how to do deep scientific investigation. Today, such training, which dates back to the middle of the 19th century, is in desperate need of an overhaul.

The amount of scientific knowledge has exploded, giving rise to new fields in science with differing concepts, tools, and cultures. The training of new scientists has become a highly specialized endeavor that frequently emphasizes the acquisition of factual knowledge instead of skills that are essential for good scientific practice, such as critical thinking, rigorous research design, analysis, and philosophy of science. Many training programs today turn out young scientists with overly narrow interests and

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from STAT

STAT10 min readPolitics
How Joe Grogan, A Former Pharma Lobbyist, Upended Trump’s Drug Pricing Agenda
This brash, combative former pharma lobbyist is one of the most powerful Trump aides you’ve never heard of. He’s reshaping the administration’s drug pricing policy by blocking one idea at…
STAT4 min readSociety
Opinion: International Pricing Index ‘Accomplishes Nothing It Sets Out To Do’
Let's find a better solution than the international pricing index, which is like 1970s-style rent control: both artificially lower pricing and ultimately limit supply.
STAT2 min readSociety
With European Backing, The World Is On The Brink Of The First Approved Ebola Vaccine
After years of effort, the world has come a major step closer to having the fully licensed Ebola vaccine.