The New York Times

A Measured Look at a Study That Alarmed Some Drinkers

Last week a paper was published in The Lancet that claimed to be the definitive study on the benefits and dangers of drinking. The news was apparently not good for those who enjoy alcoholic beverages. It was covered in the news media with headlines like “There’s No Safe Amount of Alcohol.”

The truth is much less newsy and much more measured.

Limitations of Study Design

It’s important to note that this study, like most major studies of alcohol, wasn’t a new trial. It was a meta-analysis, or a merging of data, from many observational studies. It was probably the largest meta-analysis ever done to estimate the risks from drinking for 23 different alcohol-related health problems.

This article originally appeared in .

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The New York Times

The New York Times5 min read
Screen Use Tied to Children's Brain Development
(Science Times) ; (The Checkup) In a study, preschoolers who used screens less had better language skills.
The New York Times4 min read
Tax Wealthy, but Windfall May Not Last
(The Upshot) Most taxes exist as a necessary evil. The United States government taxes people’s income not because it wants them to earn less income, but because it is a way to raise a lot of money. States tax retail sales not to discourage people fro
The New York Times6 min read
It's Time to Take Down the Mona Lisa
(Critic's Notebook) Leonardo’s painting is a security hazard, an educational obstacle and not even a satisfying bucket-list item. It’s time the Louvre moved it out of the way.