AQ: Australian Quarterly

Science is messy, so why is SciComm clean? Time to get elbow deep.

Nowhere is science’s struggle with public trust more evident than when we look at the disparity between what the science and empirical evidence shows, and what some of the general public thinks the science shows: think climate change, evolution and vaccines.

Arguably, despite years of trying, traditional science news sources are not reaching out to certain sections of the general public. The general public includes everyone. People like you, as well as people without such good taste in magazines.

Buy why isn’t everyone listening?

When it comes to translating the stuffy, formal scientific language into digestible and engaging content for a broader audience, we tend look to the cheerleader of

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from AQ: Australian Quarterly

AQ: Australian Quarterly7 min read
Deleting Democracy: Australia And The Surveillance Juggernaut
The ‘datafication’ of the economy as we near the third decade of the 21st century is all-pervasive. The model, in the space of a decade and a half, has become so utterly hegemonic that it has earned its status as a special type of capitalism – Survei
AQ: Australian Quarterly11 min read
The Human Factor
Yes, it’s the Brave New World of direct-to-consumer genetic testing – and it’s coming to a barbecue near you. Already, the companies that offer the service turn an estimated $100 million in annual global sales. On some estimates, the market will clim
AQ: Australian Quarterly8 min read
FROM THE ARCHIVE Party Spirit In Politics
When William III [of England] determined to select his ministers from the dominant party in the House of Commons [in 1698], he created a distinction for future generations between politics and statecraft and between the politician and the statesman.