STAT

Opinion: We need a temporary moratorium on using gene editing to create babies

The rationale for using #CRISPR and other gene-editing to modify eggs, sperm, and embryos doesn't make sense. We need a moratorium on doing that until it is clearer.

On a cold, drizzly night almost three years ago, I stood inside the nearly deserted Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., I was in town to attend the first International Summit on Human Gene Editing organized by the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Medicine. After a day of intense talks at the meeting, I had gone for a long walk and found myself looking up at Big Abe. A big question was on my mind: Would the organizers of the meeting call for a moratorium on using CRISPR to make gene-edited babies, as I hoped they would?

They didn’t.

When I learned of that decision, my feeling was that someone would report the creation of the first

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from STAT

STAT2 min readSociety
More Than 15% Of U.S. Adults Are Physically Inactive, New CDC Data Show
More than 1 in 7 adults across all U.S. states and territories are physically inactive, new CDC data show.
STAT6 min read
Opinion: Goop’s Pseudoscience Ministry Comes To Netflix
Gwyneth Paltrow's Goop has embraced mediums and mysticism. With spirits and the divine on board, "The Goop Lab" on Netflix has the missing ingredients to cement lifestyle as the new…
STAT6 min read
‘Donation After Cardiac Death’: New Heart Transplant Method Being Tested For The First Time In The U.S.
A new method of “reanimating” donor hearts from those who have died from cardiac failure is being tested in the U.S. and may be able to expand amount of people…